High-quality, low-quantity: A data-centric approach to deep learning performance optimization in digital X-Ray radiography
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The accuracy of identifying defects using specialized deep learning models can be affected by the circumstances in which the training data is curated. This is especially evident in digital X-ray radiography, where the depiction of flaws is significantly impacted by the exposure conditions. This study examines the effect of curating high-quality data on deep learning models. The variation in contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), which is a crucial metric of image quality between features of interest and an adjacent normal background, has been found to be a key factor in model generalization in digital X-ray radiography applications. By making systematic alterations to exposure conditions during data curation, it was possible to obtain several representations of flaws in each test component with varying contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) in the resultant radiographs. To evaluate the efficacy of the model under various conditions, two distinct datasets were curated. Dataset 1 was obtained by acquiring images with a consistent exposure setting on 140 test samples. The samples contained 4 morphologically distinct classes of flat bottom holes with seven different depths and sizes. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) representations of flaws in this dataset can be attributed only to differences in depth in Dataset 1. Additionally, Dataset 2 was curated with an expanded range of CNR values by methodically adjusting exposure settings during image acquisitions. Hence, only 42 % of the test pieces from Dataset 1, which had three distinct depths of flat bottom holes, were used. Each of the two datasets was used to separately train YOLOv8 for instance segmentation and U-net for multi-class semantic segmentation. Each model was trained under the same conditions, and their performances were assessed using test sets from both dataset groups. The model trained on Dataset 1 exhibited a notable decline in performance when evaluated on test sets from Dataset 2, suggesting a lack of generalization ability. Conversely, the model that was trained using Dataset 2 consistently achieved high accuracy on both test sets, demonstrating impressive performance and successful generalization. This work shows that the generalization abilities of deep learning models may be improved by varying the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of features in the training data. This finding paves the way for practical applications in digital X-ray radiography.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».