MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4406967553 · doi:10.1097/ms9.0000000000002962

Enhancing bowel health and hygiene with portable toilet sprayers for low- and middle-income countries

2025· editorial· en· W4406967553 sur OpenAlexaff
Md. Kamrul Hasan

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of Medicine and Surgery · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineNursing
ThématiqueChild Nutrition and Water Access
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityImpact
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHygieneToiletLow and middle income countriesEnvironmental healthPublic healthDeveloping countryNursingEconomic growthPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Constipation and hygiene-related illnesses are prevalent in underdeveloped regions, primarily due to inadequate sanitation facilities and poor hygiene practices[1]. While various interventions have been implemented to address these issues, the specific role of portable toilet sprayers in enhancing bowel health and hygiene has not been thoroughly investigated. This editorial highlights portable toilet sprayers as a novel, practical solution for resource-constrained settings, emphasizing their potential to improve health outcomes efficiently. Conventional means of treating constipation, such as dietary adjustments and laxatives, are sometimes ineffective due to inadequate resources. Portable toilet sprayers offer a unique approach by directly facilitating bowel movements through perineal stimulation and improving hygiene by effectively cleaning the anal area. Although no direct studies on portable sprayers exist, their mechanisms align with broader findings on water-based sanitation innovations and their impact on public health. Unlike conventional methods, such as toilet paper, sprayers provide a water-based cleaning mechanism that can reduce friction and irritation, potentially decreasing the incidence of constipation and anal fissures. These underexposed benefits highlight the potential of portable sprayers as a focused intervention for addressing sanitation-related challenges in resource-constrained settings, where improved access to hygiene tools can have a significant public health impact[2,3]. Water-based interventions, including transanal irrigation, are effective in managing severe bowel dysfunctions by promoting stool evacuation and improving anorectal coordination. Although portable toilet sprayers are not medical devices and have not been studied for such conditions, they may operate on similar principles. The application of water to the anal area may reduce friction, ease the passage of hard stools, and promote relaxation of the anal sphincter muscles. These attributes suggest that portable sprayers could serve as a noninvasive tool for improving hygiene and potentially alleviating mild constipation in resource-limited settings[4]. Beyond facilitating bowel movements, portable toilet sprayers can significantly enhance public health by reducing the transmission of fecal-oral diseases. By providing a more thorough cleaning method, sprayers can decrease the presence of pathogenic microorganisms, thereby lowering infection rates. This aligns with findings from studies on improved sanitation practices leading to better health outcome[3]. Using water to clean up feces removes more fecal matter than toilet paper, lowering the risk of illness and improving overall hygiene[5]. This is especially crucial in locations where access to clean water and soap is limited. Portable sprayers could represent a low-cost solution, potentially making them accessible to low-income households. While their affordability and convenience need further evaluation, they hold promise as a practical intervention to improve health outcomes and enhance the quality of life for many people in resource-limited settings. Implementing portable toilet sprayers in underdeveloped regions requires a comprehensive strategy that includes community engagement, education on proper usage, and collaboration with local health organizations. Implementing portable toilet sprayers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) necessitates a multifaceted approach with specific measures and methods to ensure success: Pilot Studies: Conduct small-scale pilot projects in selected LMIC communities to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of portable sprayers. Metrics such as user satisfaction, frequency of use, and impact on bowel health and hygiene can guide scalability decisions[6]. Community Engagement: Incorporate participatory approaches by involving local leaders, healthcare workers, and community members. Educational workshops and live demonstrations on the benefits and proper use of sprayers can improve acceptance and adoption rates[7]. Distribution and Accessibility: Partner with local manufacturers and NGOs to produce low-cost sprayers locally, reducing costs and ensuring consistent supply. Distribution through healthcare centers, schools, and community hubs can maximize reach[8]. Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish a framework to track the impact of sprayer use on health outcomes such as reduced constipation rates and improved hygiene. Collecting user feedback and conducting periodic evaluations can help refine the intervention[9]. Low-cost sanitation technologies have shown promise in improving hygiene and health outcomes in resource-limited settings, suggesting that portable sprayers could be integrated into existing public health frameworks. Programs such as UNICEF’s Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene initiative have successfully collaborated with local communities to implement affordable solutions, such as handwashing stations, highlighting the potential for similar scalable interventions. These collaborations have led to significant improvements in hygiene practices and reductions in waterborne diseases[10]. Pilot studies in specific communities will give helpful information about the effectiveness and acceptability of portable sprayers. These investigations can assist in modifying the intervention to meet local requirements and preferences[11]. Raising awareness regarding the advantages of utilizing toilet sprayers is critical. Educational resources should explain the health benefits and show proper usage. Community workshops and collaborations with local health workers can help to increase outreach efforts[12]. Collaboration with local and international health organizations can help to distribute sprayers more efficiently. These alliances can also assist in securing funds and resources for long-term implementation[13]. Making sprayers inexpensive and accessible is critical to broader adoption. While the initial cost of portable toilet sprayers may be a consideration, they are more affordable than constructing conventional sanitation facilities. For example, basic portable sprayers can be produced locally at a low cost, and their use has been associated with improved hygiene and reduced incidence of sanitation-related diseases. Additionally, the long-term health benefits and potential healthcare cost savings make them a cost-effective solution for improving sanitation in low- and middle-income countries[14]. Local manufacturing and distribution through medical facilities and community centers may contribute to this goal[15]. Continuous monitoring and evaluation will assist in determining the intervention’s effectiveness and identifying areas for improvement. Collecting user feedback will also guarantee that the sprayers meet the community’s needs[1]. In conclusion, portable toilet sprayers provide a simple but efficient solution for enhancing bowel health and cleanliness in undeveloped areas. Sprayers can treat common health conditions associated with poor sanitation by increasing bowel movement and hygiene. Implementing this intervention necessitates a multidisciplinary team (MDT) that includes research, education, partnerships, and close monitoring. Future studies should include randomized controlled trials to assess sprayer efficacy in lowering constipation rates, longitudinal studies to track long-term health outcomes, and qualitative studies to better understand user experiences and challenges to adoption. Portable toilet sprayers, when used correctly, can make a major contribution to public health gains in resource-limited settings.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,037

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of Medicine and SurgeryMême sujetChild Nutrition and Water AccessTravaux en français237 207