Risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection following use of fluoroquinolones: a retrospective multinational network cohort study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are commonly used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs), but some studies have suggested they may increase the risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection (AA/AD). However, no large-scale international study has thoroughly assessed this risk. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large, distributed network analysis across 14 databases from 5 countries (United States, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Australia). The study included 13,588,837 patients aged 35 or older who initiated systemic fluoroquinolones (FQs) or comparable antibiotics (trimethoprim with or without sulfamethoxazole [TMP] or cephalosporins [CPHs]) for UTI treatment in the outpatient setting between JAN 01, 2010 and DEC 31, 2019. Patients were included if at the index date they had at least 365 days of prior observation and were not hospitalised for any reason on or within 7 days prior to the index date. The primary outcome was AA/AD occurrence within 60 days of exposure, with secondary outcomes examining AA and AD separately. Cox proportional hazards models with 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching were used to estimate the risk, with results calibrated using negative control outcomes. Analyses were subjected to pre-defined study diagnostics, and only those passing all diagnostics were reported. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis. Findings: Among analyses that passed diagnostics there were 1,954,798 and 1,195,962 propensity-matched pairs for the FQ versus TMP and FQ versus CPH comparisons respectively. For the 60-day follow-up there was no difference in risk of AA/AD between FQ and TMP (absolute rate difference [ARD], 0.21 per 1000 person-year; calibrated HR, 0.91 [95% CI 0.73-1.10]). There was no significant difference in risk for FQ versus CPH (ARD, 0.11 per 1000 person-year; calibrated HR, 1.01 [95% CI 0.82-1.25]). Interpretation: This large-scale study used a rigorous design with objective diagnostics to address bias and confounding. There was no increased risk of AA/AD associated with FQ compared to TMP or CPH in patients treated for UTI in the outpatient setting. As we only examined FQ used to treat UTIs in the outpatient setting, the results may not be generalisable to other indications with different severity. Funding: Yonsei University College of Medicine, Government-wide R&D Fund project for infectious disease research (GFID), Republic of Korea, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australian Government. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI), Department of Veterans Affairs, the United States Government.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».