MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4407147141 · doi:10.1111/add.16778

Tripping on Utopia: Margaret Mead, the Cold War, and the Troubled Birth of Psychedelic Science. By BenjaminBreen, New York, USA: Grand Central Publishing, 2024, ISBN: 9781538722374

2025· article· en· W4407147141 sur OpenAlexaff
Andrea Ens

Notice bibliographique

RevueAddiction · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePsychedelics and Drug Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Saskatchewan
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUtopiaPublishingTrippingCold warArt historyPsychologySociologyHistoryArtPolitical scienceEngineeringLawLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Public media attention to psychedelic research in recent years has prompted historians and humanities scholars to re-examine longstanding popular and scholarly assumptions about the history of psychoactive substances. Recent works such as Chris Elcock's Psychedelic New York [1] and Ido Hartogsohn's American Trip [2], for example, revise prior understandings of the central actors, timelines and geographies of global psychedelics research while also exploring the important role these drugs have played beyond medical research in the arts, social sciences and popular culture. Benjamin Breen's Tripping on Utopia is a welcome addition to this new body of literature. This book presents a novel account of the central ideas and actors that shaped the practical and philosophical dimensions of twentieth-century psychedelic science. The book compellingly argues that Marget Mead, her ex-husband Gregory Bateson, and their fellow Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation conference associates believed interdisciplinary psychedelic science might create a new utopian world order by rapidly expanding humanity's collective consciousness. Drawing from wider social and cultural debates about science's relationship with society between 1923 and 1980, their shared convictions infused projects ranging from Mead's examinations of Native American peyote ceremonies to clandestine experiments attempting to teach dolphins to speak in English with idealist goals. Breen's approach is informed by a rich primary source base that includes ‘private photographs’, ‘cryptic diary entries’, ‘forgotten manuscripts’, ‘scribbled letters’ and ‘classified memos’ authored by Mead and her contemporaries over this historical period [3]. The book is organized chronologically and divided into three sections covering unique eras of Mead and the Macy circle's utopian thinking. After conducting research together among the Omaha people in Nebraska and in New Guinea in the early 1930s, Mead and Bateson fell in love; the two were equally convinced that psychedelics, anthropology and science could create a globally shared human consciousness celebrating diversity. However, their idealistic goals took a backseat to geopolitical objectives through the Second World War as Mead and Bateson obsessed over projects aiming to ‘cure’ Nazi psychological manipulation. Bateson began advocating clandestine psychological warfare tactics while working for the Office of Strategic Services between 1943 and 1945, while Mead struggled to hide her queer romantic relationships to maintain delicate security clearances. Although Mead and Bateson's marriage became strained and fell apart through the 1940s and early 1950s, they remained intellectually connected through their involvement in Macy Foundation conferences and in early psychedelic research networks. Bateson's group at the Medical Research Institute began investigating the qualitative role of set and setting in psychedelic research and therapy, laying the foundations for California's insular psychedelic science networks through the following decades. Mead, meanwhile, participated in mid-1950s lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) research and believed psychedelics could help individual users and the entire global population rapidly adjust to geopolitical, social and cultural change. She was likely also connected to the CIA's notorious MKULTRA program in these years. By 1959, psychedelic science had split into two polarizing camps, and although researchers like Timothy Leary boldly claimed to offer a revolutionary new approach to ‘collective transcendence,’ others, like Mead, feared these drugs could destabilize society rather than unite humanity under a common utopian banner [3]. These divisions increased as psychedelics became targets of widespread media panic during the late 1960s. Mead and Bateson each abandoned the field before MKULTRA's harms came to light in the mid-1970s. Although their utopian hopes for psychedelic science never came to fruition, their shared dream of science as a ‘transformative and redemptive’ endeavor has survived into the present day [3]. The title Tripping on Utopia is, therefore, apt in a dual sense as it captures Mead and her circle's deep belief in the power of psychedelic science alongside their stumbling attempts to translate idealistic visions into reality through the twentieth century. Clinicians, researchers, humanities scholars and general readers alike will appreciate Breen's ability to balance intimate personal biographies with intellectual and cultural history in this clear, engaging examination of utopian-minded psychedelic research. Both the publisher and author must be commended for their generous use of visual sources such as maps, photographs and scans of historical documents throughout the text. The book's temporal and topical scope is wider than the title implies. Bateson is an equal protagonist, for instance, and the narrative demonstrates that psychedelic research began in the 1920s rather than the 1960s as commonly believed. Further, although Breen follows Mead's global travels, the narrative is firmly rooted in the United States because of its overall emphasis on American developments and actors. It would be interesting to know if Mead's utopian philosophies were shared among various global contemporaries. Tripping on Utopia nonetheless offers a rich and thoughtful appraisal of how Mead and other historical figures shaped the intellectual foundations of psychedelic science well into our present moment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,507
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,587

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAddictionMême sujetPsychedelics and Drug StudiesTravaux en français237 207