Mekarsari village towards sustainable tourism village: A literature review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: A tourism village is a rural area designed or developed as a tourist destination by utilizing diverse local potentials. These potentials may include natural beauty, culture, traditions, handicrafts, cuisine, and local community activities that attract tourists. A tourism village serves as a place for recreation, education, and sustainable development of the local economy. Findings: [a] Empowering local communities: Active involvement of local communities is essential to maintaining the sustainability of tourism villages. Empowered communities can take a leading role in managing tourism activities, such as tour guides, homestay operators, or local artisans. Training programs and capacity-building initiatives are often vital to help communities adapt to tourists' needs while preserving their cultural identity. [b] Preservation of local culture: Sustainable tourism villages support the preservation of cultural heritage, such as traditions, arts, and local crafts. This creates a unique attraction for tourists while safeguarding local culture from extinction. Practices such as routine cultural performances, traditional festivals, and the promotion of local products are essential strategies. [c] Environmental conservation: Proper waste management, such as recycling systems or reducing plastic waste. Use of renewable energy, like solar panels or micro-hydro systems. Protection of local ecosystems, such as forests, rivers, or coral reefs. Methods: The method used is a literature review through a research approach conducted by collecting, analyzing, and evaluating relevant literature on a specific topic, based on scientific journals, books, conference proceedings, reports, and articles. Conclusion: [a] Empowering local communities: Sustainable tourism villages prioritize the involvement of local communities as the main actors in tourism management. This includes participation in planning, management, and benefiting from tourism activities. [b] Environmental conservation: In sustainable tourism villages, the use of natural resources is regulated to avoid damaging ecosystems. Waste management, the use of renewable energy, and the protection of biodiversity are essential components. [c] Economic sustainability: Tourism villages should create stable and equitable economic opportunities, including generating new jobs, supporting micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), and promoting village economic growth without overexploiting local resources. [d] Preservation of culture and traditions: Sustainable tourism villages protect and promote local culture and traditions, making them a key attraction while maintaining the identity of the local community. [e] Multi-stakeholder collaboration: Sustainable tourism villages require support from various stakeholders, including government, private sectors, academics, and the community, to ensure effective management and development.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».