MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4407190067 · doi:10.1111/jdv.20578

Expanding <i>PIGM</i>‐related disorders to coding mutations

2025· letter· en· W4407190067 sur OpenAlexaff
Romain Nicolle, Laura Russell, Véronique Abadie, Patrick Nitschké, Christine Bole, Simon‐Pierre Guay, Thi Tuyet Mai Nguyen, Stéphanie Leclerc‐Mercier, Stanislas Lyonnet, Julie Steffann, Philippe M. Campeau, Jacob Mashiah, Christine Bodemer, S. Hadj‐Rabia, Jeanne Amiel

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · 2025
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueComplement system in diseases
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de MontréalUniversité de SherbrookeMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineGeneticsComputational biology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) is a complex glycolipid that anchors over 150 proteins to the cell membrane surface. To date, over 20 genes (PIG_ and PGAP2 genes below) involved in the synthesis of the GPI-anchor have been associated with a group of Mendelian multisystem disorders known as inherited GPI deficiencies (IGD) and belonging to the broader group of congenital disorders of glycosylation. Among them, glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesisdefect-1 (GPIBD1, MIM610293) is an autosomal recessive condition related to PIGM.1 To date, eight patients have been reported. Seven patients have presented with thrombophilia leading to cerebral and portal vein thrombosis, seizures, macrocephaly and thrombocytopenia starting from the age of 5 months, and they carry a recurrent homozygous noncoding variant in the promoter region of PIGM.2-4 The last patient carries a homozygous missense variant in PIGM. He presented with dermatological and craniofacial features, portal vein thrombosis, rapidly progressive and fatal multicystic encephalomalacia with ventriculomegaly and suppression burst at EEG.1 We report 2 additional patients, carrying coding variants in PIGM, with a multiple congenital anomaly and intellectual disability (MCA)-ID syndrome characterized by ichthyosis, redundant skin folds, severe encephalopathy and craniofacial anomalies (Table 1 and Figure 1) being the severe end of the spectrum of PIGM gene-related anomalies. Patient 1 died of sepsis at 5 weeks of age. Patient 2 is now 7 years old. No weight gain, died at 5 weeks of age from sepsis. Steatosis and no other malformation at autopsy Normal growth (H: 60th c., W: 90th c., OFC: 96th c.) at 6 years Cardiomegaly from 5 years with normal EKG except for repolarization abnormality Walking unaided at 2 years, poor eye contact and < 100 spoken words at 7 years, episodes of pneumonia requiring BIPAP c.1254_1257del, p.(Arg419Serfs*81)pat Frequency in genomADv4: 0.000115 and no homozygotes c.1111 T > C, p.(Trp371Arg)mat not reported c.1254_1257del, p.(Arg419Serfs*81)mat Frequency in genomADv4: 0.000115 and no homozygotes c.402C > A, p.(Asn134Lys) pat Frequency in genomADv4: 0.000002703 in non-Finnish Europeans Both patients presented with variable congenital epidermal manifestations associating severe and diffuse ichthyosis, squamous plaques on eyelids, trunk and arms with yellowish to brown skin in patient 1 (Figure 1a,b) and fine scales on erythematous skin in patient 2. Brady et al. reported thickened, lichenified and orange peel-like skin.1 Wrinkling of the skin was either diffuse (patient 1, Figure 1c) or limited to forehead and midface (patient 2). In the latter, skin became dry (cheeks, auricular folds), with scaling areas on the dorsum of hands and feet mostly in winter from 2 years. Skin biopsy, taken in patient 1, showed ichthyotic changes (Figure 1d,e). Normal skin reported with noncoding mutations in PIGM is surprising considering the decreased expression of total GPI and CD59 in fibroblasts.4 The residual expression of PIGM mRNA in fibroblasts compared to blood cell suggests a quantitative threshold for skin manifestation2, 3 as skin involvement in both patients is most likely the consequence of GPI biosynthesis deregulation. Skin manifestations are reported in IGD: onychodystrophy (PIGY), palmoplantar keratoderma (PIGO) and ichthyosiform dermatosis (GPIBD5, MIM28000).5 Epidermal-specific knockout of PigA in mice mimics human Harlequin ichthyosis.6 Altogether, epidermal involvement (ichthyosis +/− palmoplantar keratoderma) is more frequent than dermal involvement (soft and sagging skin or cutis laxa) reported only with PIGO, PIGM and possibly PIGQ mutations. Cleft palate (patient 1) is reported with PIGM, PGAP2, PIGV, PIGO and PIGN mutations.5-9 Both Trp371 and Asn134 are highly conserved amino acids of PIGM. Trp371 lies in the mannosyltransferase domain of the protein and Asn134 at a transmembrane cytoplasmic loop. Both variants are classified damaging or probably damaging by most prediction tools. Moderate decrease for total GPI anchor validated the pathogenic nature of the variants (Figure 1f). The recurrent deletion of four nucleotides should escape nonsense-mediated decay as it lies in the last exon. It is presumed to elongate the protein and replace the last 5 amino acids of the normal PIGM protein by 80 incorrect ones and could lead to a stable protein retaining some function. Thus, a more severe phenotype could be expected in patient(s) with biallelic loss-of-function variants. Many examples illustrates the concept of tissue-specific deregulation of a gene leading to endophenotypes from the full-blown spectrum of features ascribed to coding sequence mutations. PIGM can be added to the list with the particularity of full-blown presentation being described second. We thank the families for their participation, MSDAvenir (Devo-Decode project) and the Philanthropy Department of Mutuelles AXA (Head and Heart Chair) for their support. None. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The patient's parents in this manuscript have given written informed consent to the publication of their case details. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,821
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologyMême sujetComplement system in diseasesTravaux en français237 207