A203 A CASE OF PEDIATRIC CROHN’S DISEASE AND ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS AT DIAGNOSIS: A COLLISION OF PHENOTYPES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The co-occurrence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and adenomatous polyposis syndrome is uncommon. Aims To highlight the challenges of diagnosis and management of a rare case of concurrent adenomatous polyps in a child with newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease. Methods Review of patient charts, endoscopic and histopathology images from electronic medical records. Results An 11-year-old boy of Korean origin presented with a 6-month history of periumbilical abdominal pain, diarrhea, 5 kg weight loss, and a perianal abscess, which spontaneously ruptured the week prior. Family history revealed a father with uninvestigated vague abdominal symptoms and increased stool frequency for a few years. His mother had two adenomatous colonic polyps removed in the preceding year at age 43. There was no family history of IBD, polyposis syndrome or early colorectal cancer. Physical examination revealed weight-for-age Z-score of -1.55 and height Z-score of 0.53 (with normal growth velocity), mild right lower quadrant abdominal tenderness and a healing perianal abscess. Colonoscopy revealed nodularity from sigmoid colon to cecum, with a few deep ulcerations in the sigmoid, transverse and ascending colon. Additionally, there were prominent polyps in the transverse and ascending colon, with 3-4 sessile large polyps (>1cm) and numerous smaller polyps scattered between the sigmoid to cecum (figures 1A & B). Ileocecal valve was bulky, and ileoscopy revealed deep ulcers and nodularity. Histopathology revealed multiple non-necrotizing epithelioid granulomas without enterocolitis in duodenum and colon. Surprisingly, foci of bi- and tri-crypt superficial adenomas were noted in colonic biopsies (figures 1C & D). Magnetic resonance enterography demonstrated extensive active inflammation in the mid and distal ileum, narrowing in the ileocecal region, and an inter-sphincteric perianal abscess. We commenced monotherapy with subcutaneous adalimumab using standard induction and maintenance dosing. He has been referred to a specialized polyposis syndrome clinic for genetic testing (results pending) and ongoing cancer surveillance. Conclusions Adenomatous polyps are extremely rare at diagnosis in pediatric IBD and most polyps in this setting are presumed to be inflammatory pseudo-polyps. Their presence raises suspicion of adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Adequate biopsies are crucial for accurate diagnosis and for guiding surveillance and treatment. A detailed family history of colorectal disease is essential. Vitale V et al (2016) have described a hamartomatous polyp with IBD at diagnosis in a 6y old. This is to the best of our knowledge the first reported case of pediatric IBD with colonic adenomatous polyposis at diagnosis. Anti-TNF medications are presumed safe in this setting and genetic evaluation can provide insights into syndromic associations. Figure 1: A) Nodularity in sigmoid colon which possibly represents nascent polyps; B) Larger polypoidal structures interspersed between pseudo polyps and ulceration in ascending colon; C) & D) Hematoxylin and eosin stain showing biopsies of the cecum and sigmoid colon (respectively), with foci of low-grade dysplasia involving 2-4 crypts (arrows), representing superficial tiny adenomas. Of note is the surrounding unremarkable mucosa without features of chronic or active Crohn’s disease [4x magnification, both images]. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».