A196 MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOMES IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH IBD TREATED WITH USTEKINUMAB OR RISANKIZUMAB: A CASE SERIES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Biologics are an important therapy for patients with moderate to severe IBD. These include Ustekinumab (UST) – anti-IL-12/23, and the newer biologic Risankizumab (RIS) – anti-IL23. For UST, the PIANO registry and some cohort studies found no significant difference in maternal/neonatal outcomes compared to controls. However, the EPI-MERES registry found an increase in likelihood of small for gestational age births, and one study reported a slower initial postnatal growth rate for in-utero exposed infants. RIS currently has limited evidence in pregnancy. Aims We present a case series of maternal and neonatal outcomes of UST and RIS treated pregnant patients with IBD. Methods We conducted a single-centre case series including patients treated with UST and RIS at any point during pregnancy enrolled between Jan 1, 2017 and Jul 31, 2024. Data was collected on maternal outcomes including live birth, miscarriage, delivery method, and pregnancy-related complications. Neonatal outcomes included preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), congenital anomalies, NICU admission, APGAR scores, and neonatal infection. Results There were 23 UST patients – 21 (91.3%) had live births and 2 (8.7%) had miscarriages. Of the 21 that delivered, there were 12 (57.1%) vaginal deliveries, 8 (38.1%) elective c-sections, and 1 (4.8%) emergency c-section due to placental insufficiency. One patient had gestational diabetes, 1 had pre-eclampsia, but there were no preterm premature rupture of membranes or intrauterine growth restrictions (IUGR). Of the 21 neonates, 3 (14.3%) were preterm, 1 (4.8%) was SGA, 3 (14.3%) were LGA, and 1 unknown. There were no congenital anomalies. Five (23.8%) infants were admitted to the NICU after birth and 1 (4.8%) was reported to have a postnatal infection within 3 months. Of the 12 infants with known APGAR scores, 10 had scores ≥7 at 1 minute, and 2 were <7. At 5 minutes, all scores were ≥7. Of the 2 RIS patients, 1 was exposed to RIS throughout the entire pregnancy and the other was given a dose during the 1st and 3rd trimester only. Both pregnancies resulted in live births with 1 vaginal delivery and 1 elective c-section. One neonate was LGA. One had an APGAR score of 8 at 1 minute and 9 at 5 minutes. The other infant scored 9 at 1 minute and the score at 5 minutes was not documented. There were no preterm births, congenital anomalies, or pregnancy-related complications. Conclusions In our case series of UST and RIS exposed pregnancies, there were no significant adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Further data is necessary to better characterize the safety of both medications. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».