Editorial: Environmental processes driving to slope failures: investigations, monitoring, and modelling through natural field laboratories
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Gunzburger et al., 2005;Popescu, 2002). The sequence highlights how various methods and approaches can contribute to monitoring and understanding the process, ultimately aiming to predict future scenarios. The research papers published in this Research Topic are cited in the scheme according to the methods and approaches they adopt and the causative factors they address.Within this conceptual framework, a deeper understanding of damage propagation within rock matrices or joint networks provides a more constrained interpretation of the time-dependent effects that lead to mechanical degradation and weakening of natural systems and that anticipate failure. This would support the deepening of principles of a subcritical and progressive rock mass failure, enabling its reproduction through numerical approaches and proper digital twins. The scientific community that deals with landslides and associated risk has in the last decade been particularly committed to shifting the focus of research from analytical approaches, aimed at hazard definition, towards quantitative analyses of scenarios, which are more markedly functional for the adoption of risk mitigation and resilience strategies of the exposed communities.From this perspective, several studies demonstrated that the connection between laboratory practices, monitoring, and modelling represents a significant tool for understanding the mechanical behaviour of geomaterials across different scales and is crucial for projecting the future evolution of natural processes, including landslides, in a forward-scenario perspective. To this end, creating and training learning systems based on data-informed approaches that find their best expression in multiparametric monitoring and machine and deep learning methods is necessary. The application of artificial intelligence to landslide risk assessment is a promising and reliable tool for future advancements in risk mitigation studies.In this research topic, we collect articles covering different approaches, including laboratory and advanced field surveys. Articles are numbered and reported in the sketch of Fig. 1.• Laboratory (from a texture scale to a rock-mass system)The study on the Lanniqing landslide in Southwest China by Xu et al. (#1 in Fig. 1) examined particle size characteristics using various preprocessing methods and a laser particle size analyser. The research revealed that the coarsening of particles and increased clay content in the sliding zone indicate multiple shear and compression events. The study concluded that traffic load, slope cutting, and rainfall contribute to landslide occurrence, with high clay content and low permeability leading to excessive pore water pressure and mineral lubrication. The study on Ili loess in China by Lai et al. (#2 in Fig. 1) investigated the effects of wet and dry cycles on soil properties using direct shear tests, triaxial shear tests, and scanning electron microscopy. The study found that shear strength decreased with wet-dry cycles, with triaxial tests showing higher shear strength and cohesion but lower internal friction angles than direct shear tests. Microstructural changes were identified as the primary cause of shear strength deterioration, providing valuable insights for engineering in Central Asia.• Monitoring (learning from real testbed towards digital twins) Three papers report studies on monitoring environmental processes driving slope failures, focusing on temperature fluctuations and their effects on rock weathering and landslide dynamics. A year-long study in Hamilton, Canada by Gage et al. (#3 in Fig. 1), examined thermomechanical weathering in temperate climates, revealing minute-scale temperature oscillations that magnify over time and produce significant thermal stress. Seasonality and site-specific characteristics influence the rock thermal regime, with thermomechanical weathering potential highest in spring. Fiorucci et al. (#4 in Fig. 1) carried out research in the Cinque Terre National Park, Italy, over two years to investigate hydrological dynamics in terraced landscapes. Results showed that coarse-grained, anthropically remoulded soils favour rapid rainwater infiltration, causing sharp changes in soil volumetric water content and pore water pressure. Seasonal trends of alternating slow drying and fast wetting were observed. The study by Narcisi et al. (#5 in Fig. 1) in the western Alps of Piemonte, Italy, discusses the relationship between climatic factors and displacement rates of three slow-moving landslides over 30 years . This research combined in-situ monitoring and remote sensing techniques, demonstrating correlations between significant meteorological events and variations in displacement time series.• Modelling (Numerical twins towards the analysis of scenarios)The paper by Chicco et al. (Paper #6 in Fig. 1) analyses the impact of wildfires on soil properties in the Susa Valley, Italy. Through controlled fire simulations and numerical modelling, they found that significant temperature increases in the soil are limited to a shallow depth. Field tests showed that at 2 cm below the surface, temperatures never exceeded 70°C, suggesting minimal impact on soil components and properties at greater depths. The second paper, by Jensen et al. (#7 in Fig. 1), investigates the use of seismic resonance and surface displacement measurements for landslide monitoring at Courthouse Mesa, Utah. Over three years, researchers observed crack aperture increases of 2-4 mm/year, with significant seasonal variations in modal parameters driven primarily by temperature changes. This study suggests a thermal wedging-ratcheting mechanism and demonstrates the value of combining seismic resonance and crack aperture data for improved rock slope instability characterisation and monitoring.The editors hope that this volume provides valuable scientific insights and serves as a source of inspiration for future research. We extend our best wishes to readers for a thoughtprovoking and enriching experience.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».