MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4407302287 · doi:10.1093/fshmag/vuaf009

Sing like fish: How sound rules life under water

2025· article· en· W4407302287 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Edmund S. Hobson, Hailey L. Davies, Meredith A V White, Talen Rimmer, Francis Juanes

Notice bibliographique

RevueFisheries · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Victoria
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFish <Actinopterygii>Sound (geography)FisheryBiologyGeologyOceanography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In Sing Like Fish, Canadian science writer Amorina Kingdon uses her narrative skill to bring readers under water, where she states that “sound mediates lives.” The 10 chapters in the book explore this thesis through three primary lines of questioning: (1) What is sound and how does hearing function under water? (2) How do marine animals produce, detect and interpret sounds? (3) How is anthropogenic activity changing marine soundscapes? Kingdon addresses these core questions by weaving together the history of acoustic research, vivid descriptions of early scientific experiments and present-day field studies. Throughout, she recounts personal experiences interacting with the marine environment and interviewing experts. She introduces a variety of biologists and field scientists and their research, which span field stations in the high Arctic to the collections of natural history museums. The chapters are packed with case studies ranging from “auditions” — efforts to record the undocumented sounds of marine organisms — to beluga whale Delphinapterus leucas and bearded seal Erignathus barbatus tagging experiments. Furthermore, she includes interesting historical backstories that highlight the ethically questionable experiments used by early scientists, such as the blinding of fish. These case studies display the variety of aquatic species that shape and are shaped by their acoustic environment. To our knowledge, Sing Like Fish is the first popular science publication exclusively focused on the acoustics of life under water. Kingdon is successful in ensuring that this book is more accessible to a general audience than academic journal articles on this topic. She guides the reader through acoustic concepts (e.g., sound attenuation, particle motion) and morphological structures (e.g., statocysts) using carefully chosen metaphors and language that avoids unexplained technical jargon. While at times it seems that Kingdon casts her net too wide in determining what to include—and chapter 10, in particular, is quite sprawling—she is successful overall in assembling a wide array of research into a compelling primer on underwater acoustics. Despite its title, Sing Like Fish does not devote the majority of its 10 chapters to fishes. There are passages describing fish sounds, such as the once-mystifying hum created by the Plainfin Midshipman Porichthys notatus and the courtship grunts of the Frillfin Goby Bathygobius soporator, but several chapters are dominated by discussion of marine mammals (primarily cetaceans) and to a lesser extent, invertebrates. While ichthyologists seeking a book dedicated to soniferous fishes may find that this book does not deliver the depth they expected, it is certainly targeted toward an audience that is interested in the broader disciplines of marine biology and bioacoustics. The technical concepts covered by Kingdon are well explained, although the nature of the acoustic focus makes the book most appealing for readers with some background in the sciences, either through formal education or personal interest. The inclusion of passages drawing attention to poor animal welfare during historical experiments encourages readers to extend empathy as well as scientific curiosity toward lesser-known marine organisms. The formatting of Sing Like Fish is most suitable for casual reading and features clever chapter titles with small, visually appealing illustrations and related quotations at the ­beginning of each chapter. Academics using the text as a research tool would find the citation style somewhat cumbersome; the references are provided at the back of the book by page number and are separated by chapter, but there are no in-text notations to indicate which content is referenced. Certain sections, such as the lengthy description of odontocete morphology in chapter 5, could have been made more concise by incorporating an appropriate figure. However, Sing Like Fish is also available as an audiobook and the scarcity of figures in the text as written makes this translation possible. As a group of interdisciplinary students and researchers in the marine sciences, we found Sing Like Fish to be an enjoyable and refreshingly approachable work on the not-so-silent underwater world. Kingdon’s talent for marrying rich prose and effective science communication draws the reader in and delivers a readable experience that is immersive, relatable, and educational.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,602
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,569

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFisheriesMême sujetExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesTravaux en français237 207