Clinical Decision-Making About Immunosuppressive Treatment in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rationale & Objective Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a heterogeneous disorder with a high risk of progression to kidney failure. There are no approved therapies for FSGS, and futility of treatment is poorly defined. The Cure Glomerulonephropathy (CureGN) study offers the opportunity to describe the characteristics of participants who started immunosuppressive therapy (IST), never received IST, or in whom this treatment was discontinued. Study Design An observational cohort. Settings & Participants Participants enrolled in CureGN with FSGS and surveyed nephrologists. Interventions The clinical and laboratory data from participants with FSGS who were enrolled in the CureGN observational cohort were reviewed to define features associated with withholding initial IST or terminating ongoing IST. Nephrologists were surveyed about what factors would influence their decision to prescribe or withdraw IST in patients with FSGS. Outcomes (1) Identify factors associated with IST initiation and discontinuation in individuals with FSGS; and (2) Identify clinical and laboratory features nephrologists consider when they recommend against the use of IST at diagnosis (initiation of care) and during the course of disease. Results Based on quantitative findings from the CureGN cohort and survey responses from practicing nephrologists, a low estimated glomerular filtration rate at presentation, significant glomerulosclerosis, and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy on kidney biopsy make initiation of IST less likely. Limitations Heterogeneous nature of the cohort and an inability to divide the patients into KDIGO subgroups of FSGS. Rationale for decision to stop or defer treatment was not available. More surveys were completed by pediatric providers, and the majority were completed by academic practitioners. Conclusions The factors that impact decisions about IST initiation and discontinuation were consistent among pediatric and internal medicine nephrologists, namely advanced scarring and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. We suggest that this information should be incorporated into patient management guidelines and clinical trial design. Plain Language Summary Patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are at high risk for progression to kidney failure and there are no approved therapies. This study from the CureGN consortium described clinical situations in which immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was started, not started, or discontinued in participants with FSGS. Furthermore, we surveyed nephrologists to better understand factors that influence the management of patients with FSGS. Participants in the CureGN cohort with a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and advanced scarring on kidney biopsy were less likely to be started on IST and have this treatment discontinued, which was similar to what surveyed providers did in practice. Understanding the characteristics of these patients may help further develop management guidelines and assist in clinical trial design.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,017 | 0,069 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».