Long-term follow-up of non‑neurologic and neurologic complications after complex adult spinal deformity surgery: results from the Scoli-RISK-1 study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE: To report all complications that occurred during the 2 to 5-year postoperative period, describe reoperations during this time period, and compare patients who did and did not have major, surgery-related complications and/or reoperations during this time period. METHODS: The Scoli-RISK-1 study enrolled 272 ASD patients undergoing surgery from 15 centers. Inclusion criteria were Cobb angle of > 80°, corrective osteotomy for congenital/revision deformity, and/or 3-column osteotomy. At each follow-up visit, any neurologic or non-neurologic adverse event(AE) was documented & categorized. RESULTS: 77 patients had a minimum 5-year follow-up. 35 surgery-related AE's occurred during the 2 to 5-year period in 25(32.5%) patients. 23/35(65.7%) major, surgery-related complications occurred in 17 patients, 22/35(62.9%) requiring reoperations in 16 patients. Rod fracture and/or pseudarthrosis was the most common complication. The most common minor, surgery-related complication was asymptomatic rod fractures with no alignment changes. Four neurological complications were reported, one of which did not require reoperation. One death occurred at 6.1 years postoperative after multiple reoperations for mechanical complications. 14/17(82.4%) patients with major, surgery-related complication had a preceding AE during the initial 2-year postoperative period. 53 non-surgery-related AEs occurred in 21(27.3%) patients with musculoskeletal(37.7%) occurring most often. No differences were observed in ODI or SRS-22r in those with/without major surgery-related complications or those with/without reoperation. CONCLUSION: During the study period, 25(32.5%) patients experienced 35 surgery-related complications, of which 23(65.7%) were major. Rod fracture with pseudarthrosis was the most common major, surgery-related complication. Neurologic complications were not found to be major drivers of reoperation. Surprisingly, PROs were similar in those with/without a major, surgery-related complication during the study period. This work has been presented as a podium presentation at the 55th Scoliosis Research Society annual meeting, Sep 9-13, 2020.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».