Large-Scale Evaluation and Liver Disease Risk Prediction in Finland’s National Electronic Health Record System: Feasibility Study Using Real-World Data
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Globally, the incidence and mortality of chronic liver disease are escalating. Early detection of liver disease remains a challenge, often occurring at symptomatic stages when preventative measures are less effective. The Chronic Liver Disease score (CLivD) is a predictive risk model developed using Finnish health care data, aiming to forecast an individual's risk of developing chronic liver disease in subsequent years. The Kanta Service is a national electronic health record system in Finland that stores comprehensive health care data including patient medical histories, prescriptions, and laboratory results, to facilitate health care delivery and research. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an automatic CLivD score with the current Kanta platform and identify and suggest improvements for Kanta that would enable accurate automatic risk detection. METHODS: In this study, a real-world data repository (Kanta) was used as a data source for "The ClivD score" risk calculation model. Our dataset consisted of 96,200 individuals' whole medical history from Kanta. For real-world data use, we designed processes to handle missing input in the calculation process. RESULTS: We found that Kanta currently lacks many CLivD risk model input parameters in the structured format required to calculate precise risk scores. However, the risk scores can be improved by using the unstructured text in patient reports and by approximating variables by using other health data-like diagnosis information. Using structured data, we were able to identify only 33 out of 51,275 individuals in the "low risk" category and 308 out of 51,275 individuals (<1%) in the "moderate risk" category. By adding diagnosis information approximation and free text use, we were able to identify 18,895 out of 51,275 (37%) individuals in the "low risk" category and 2125 out of 51,275 (4%) individuals in the "moderate risk" category. In both cases, we were not able to identify any individuals in the "high-risk" category because of the missing waist-hip ratio measurement. We evaluated 3 scenarios to improve the coverage of waist-hip ratio data in Kanta and these yielded the most substantial improvement in prediction accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the current structured Kanta data is not enough for precise risk calculation for CLivD or other diseases where obesity, smoking, and alcohol use are important risk factors. Our simulations show up to 14% improvement in risk detection when adding support for missing input variables. Kanta shows the potential for implementing nationwide automated risk detection models that could result in improved disease prevention and public health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,015 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».