Reduction of Bleeding From Pterygopalatal Injection
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is a minimally invasive surgical method that is widely used in the treatment of various sinonasal conditions, including chronic sinusitis, nasal polyps, and fungal sinusitis. However, intraoperative bleeding remains a significant challenge. Objective: To evaluate the effects of pterygopalatal injections with lidocaine and adrenaline during sinus surgery. Data Sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were systematically searched from database inception through July 31, 2024. Two authors also manually and independently searched all relevant studies. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials with (1) patients diagnosed with sinusitis; (2) interventions that included pterygopalatal injections with lidocaine and adrenaline; (3) comparisons that were specified as normal saline or no injection; and (4) outcomes that used subjective scores (Boezaart surgical field grading [BSFG]) and objective markers (amount of bleeding, duration of surgery, and mean arterial pressure [MAP]). Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction was completed independently by 2 extractors and cross-checked for research integrity. The pairwise meta-analysis was performed to compare the treatment group with control used in ESS. Hedges g standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences (MDs) were used for improvement in all outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Efficacy outcomes included subjective scores, such as BSFG, as well as objective markers measuring amount of bleeding, duration of surgery, and MAP. Results: A comprehensive literature search identified 322 patients from 7 studies. The studies were conducted in Australia, Canada, Egypt, India, and Iran. The mean age range was 30 to 48.8 years, and 36.7% to 66.7% of the study populations were male. In most studies, the observation time of BSFG was measured at 15-minute intervals and measured from a minimum of 15 minutes to a maximum of 150 minutes. The pooled SMD for BSFG between treatments vs the control group was -1.01 (95% CI, -1.72 to -0.30), indicating that pterygopalatal injection with lidocaine and adrenaline was associated with improvement in the surgical field condition. The pooled MD for MAP between treatments vs the control group was -0.49 mm Hg (95% CI, -0.91 to -0.07), indicating that pterygopalatal injection was associated with significantly reduced MAP. The pooled MD for amount of bleeding between treatments vs the control group was -9.47 mL (95% CI, -29.05 to 10.11), and the pooled MD for duration of surgery between treatments vs the control group was -4.28 minutes (95% CI, -12.85 to 4.29), indicating that that this technique was not significantly associated with amount of bleeding or duration of surgery. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that pterygopalatal injection can be an effective method for reducing BSFG during ESS to improve the surgical field. This can be achieved by significantly improving the surgical field of view and lowering MAP.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,025 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».