Hospitalizations for all-cause pediatric acute respiratory diseases in Alberta, Canada, before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-level retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2024
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: This population-level retrospective cohort study measured seasonal patterns of pediatric hospitalizations, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions, and average age of children diagnosed with acute respiratory diseases (ARD) during pre-pandemic, COVID-19 pandemic, and late/post-pandemic periods. Methods: From September 2010 through August 2024, all hospitalizations for ARD among children <18 years old were identified from the provincial Discharge Abstract Database, in Alberta, Canada. Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) models were developed based on pre-pandemic trends and predicted expected weekly outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) from March 2020 onward. Observed and expected outcomes with 95% CI were compared to measure impacts during peak seasons. Findings: There were 52,839 ARD hospitalizations: 16,003 (30.29%) bronchiolitis, 7958 (15.06%) influenza-like illness, 14,366 (27.19%) pneumonia, 2989 (5.66%) croup, 10,266 (19.43%) asthma exacerbation, and 1257 (2.38%) COVID-19. Further, 4433 (8.39%) hospitalizations included a PICU admission. During the pre-pandemic period, hospitalizations for ARD had a biennial pattern, where the peak incidence was highest every other winter season. During the pandemic and late/post-pandemic periods, the average weekly incidence of hospitalization for ARD/100,000 children decreased 91.25% during winter 2020-2021 (1.03 observed vs. 11.81 [95% CI 7.30, 16.33] expected), increased 47.98% during winter 2022-2023 (18.06 observed vs. 12.20 [95% CI 7.06, 17.34] expected), and returned near pre-pandemic incidence during winter 2023-2024 (12.87 observed vs. 11.87 [95% CI 6.08, 17.67] expected) compared with incidence predicted by the SARIMA model. During winter 2022-2023 when hospitalizations surged, there was no significant change in the average weekly incidence of PICU admissions for ARD/100,000 children (2.07 observed vs. 1.26 [95% CI 0.26, 2.27] expected), nor percent PICU admissions (10.21% observed vs. 10.11% [95% CI 5.50, 14.73] expected), nor in average age (31.95 months observed vs. 34.20 months [95% CI 25.89, 42.52] expected). Interpretation: Hospitalizations for pediatric ARD decreased dramatically during winter 2020-2021, surged during winter 2022-2023, and returned near pre-pandemic incidence during winter 2023-2024. There was no lasting change in PICU admissions nor average age. Ongoing surveillance will describe the evolving seasonal pattern of ARD during the post-pandemic period. Funding: None.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».