Resilience Among Indigenous Graduate Nursing Students: A Scoping Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aim: The aim of this scoping review was to systematically assemble, examine, and map the extant literature pertaining to the resilience among Indigenous nursing students in graduate programs. Background: Although graduate preparation for health care professionals positively influences the health outcomes of recipients of care through participation in decision-making, advanced practice roles, education, policy development, and research, colonial frameworks present in the form of institutional or program-related barriers limit the number of Indigenous students to access graduate nursing programs. Moreover, entrenched Euro-Western epistemology and ontology that privilege certain knowledges and ways of knowing reinforce the understanding of resilience as being outcomes-based. Resilience among Indigenous Peoples, however, embraces ideas of transformation and adaptation that incorporate complex social dynamics and interpersonal processes that foster movement towards well-being, healing, and growth. Design: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) framework (Moher et al., 2009) guided the reporting. Method: Six databases were searched for relevant articles by a health sciences librarian. This was supplemented by hand searches and internet searches for grey literature. A total of 708 results published between 2000 and 2023 were retrieved from the six database searches. Following title and abstract screening, a total of 88 full-text articles were independently reviewed, resulting in two items for inclusion in the study. Results: Two themes were identified from the review that may tangentially influence resilience among Indigenous graduate nursing students: identity and biculturalism. Gaps in the literature included limited global literature on resilience; no exploration of the explicit experience of resilience; study samples and populations frequently merging Indigenous students with marginalized students and Black and other racialized students, making it difficult to link findings with specific groups of participants; and reporting of support program development and evaluation of these programs. Conclusion: This review highlighted that research on Indigenous graduate nursing students’ experience of resilience is lacking. Moreover, concepts such as biculturalism perpetuate a dichotomous and colonial understanding of Indigenous graduate nursing students’ experience of resilience. Relevance to universities and nursing education programs: While strategies such as transition programs and talking circles are valuable as initial steps, governance approaches that produce program- and university-wide policies must be reconceptualized. While inclusion policies benefit student completion and retention rates, these policies do little to transform the academy. We suggest an Indigenous board of governors comprising Elders, local
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,028 | 0,090 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,030 | 0,022 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».