Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In the intricate relationship between emotions, institutions, and power, emotions are central to both reinforcing and challenging institutions and animating institutional processes. The literature at the intersection of emotions and institutions highlights how emotional experiences influence engagement with higher-order institutions, shaping practices and the symbolic systems that imbue these activities with meaning. Emotions are not just personal experiences but are deeply embedded in institutional dynamics, motivating continued adherence to institutionalized practices and values, as well as being strategically deployed to theorize, diffuse, or undermine the status quo. Institutions, as mechanisms of social control, pre-interpret the world for people, shaping their lived experiences and telling them how to think and feel. Emotions are a key pathway through which institutions exert this control, making power a more central concern in institutional theory. The distinction between systemic and episodic power is leveraged to help illuminate this dynamic. Systemic power operates through less visible means, such as institutional norms and ideological resources, while episodic power involves overt acts of coercion and manipulation. A review of existing literature highlights how emotions are implicated in the exercise of both systemic and episodic power. For instance, institutions exert systemic power over their inhabitants, conditioning emotional practice by valuing and prescribing certain emotions, creating emotional registers that dictate the legitimate use and expression of emotions within a particular institutional context. However, emotions can also drive resistance against institutional norms. Anger, for example, can signal dissatisfaction with the status quo and motivate efforts to reform or challenge institutional structures. Shame, typically associated with conformity, can also prompt reflection and resistance against institutional norms. On the other hand, extant literature suggests episodic power is clearly implicated in the ways in which institutional arrangements are created, stabilized, and changed. Episodic power is exercised through eliciting emotions in others, often through emotionally resonant rhetoric or other means such as visuals, spaces, and rituals. These emotionally charged appeals can mobilize support for institutional projects or instigate resistance. Furthermore, shared emotional experiences can foster collective identities that drive institutional change. Additionally, the literature speaks to the way in which emotional regulation—or the reflective control of emotional experiences and displays to have consciously intended effects on others—is integral to the exercise of episodic power, with several studies suggesting that regulation is a crucial enabling mechanism for effectively implementing a given institutional project. Future research should explore the interaction between systemic and episodic power, the material and temporal dimensions of emotions in institutions, and the role of unconscious processes in institutional dynamics.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».