Perceptions And Preparedness: A Study On Lgbt Patient Care Among Medical And Allied Healthcare Students And Practitioners In India Using LGBT-DOCSS
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: LGBTQ+ individuals often have unique healthcare needs, but they also face significant barriers that make it harder for them to access the care and support they deserve.. They continue to face challenges when accessing healthcare, particularly in countries like India, where social stigma and lack of adequate training among healthcare providers contribute to unequal care. [1] There is a lack of comprehensive education on LGBTQ+ healthcare, and students’ understanding of these issues is not well-documented. This study explored the knowledge and attitudes toward LGBTQ+ healthcare among medical, allied health students, and practitioners in India. Methods: This study used an online self-report survey to collect information on participants' personal and academic backgrounds, as well as their experiences with LGBT-related education during their medical and allied health studies and clinical practice. The total scores from the LGBT-DOCSS, along with the individual scores for the three subscales—clinical preparedness, knowledge, and attitudes—were analysed and compared against international standards. Results: The sample comprised of 200 respondents, all of the respondents reported a lack of LGBT community-related courses during their studies and clinical practice. The total score on the LGBT-DOCSS was 4.291 ± 0.717 out of 7, indicating a relatively low level of clinical competence. The highest mean score was in the attitude subscale (4.842 ± 1.059), which was significantly higher than the scores for the knowledge subscale (4.323 ± 1.419) and the clinical preparedness subscale (3.722 ± 1.349). Men reported higher levels of knowledge and clinical preparedness, but also showed more negative attitudes compared to women. On comparison with the scores of other countries like Israel, USA and Canada, India was lagging behind significantly in LGBT healthcare training due to Attitude of the people which was significantly lower when compared to other countries leading to such a significant difference in study. Conclusion: The participants reported low levels of clinical competency, especially in self-reported knowledge and clinical preparedness, but generally had positive attitudes toward the LGBT community. This highlights a crucial need for LGBT-inclusive education in medical and allied healthcare programs in India. The low levels of preparedness among students and clinicians stress the importance of incorporating LGBT-focused training to ensure healthcare providers are better equipped to offer inclusive and culturally competent care. Future studies should assess the long-term impact of such training on patient outcomes and healthcare delivery.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle