Health literacy and chronic disease: a comparison of somatic and mental illness
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Health literacy (HL) is increasingly recognized as essential for preventing and managing chronic illness but also for strengthening health resources and skills. However, studies on HL of people with chronic illness that adopt a multidimensional approach encompassing the three HL domains health care, disease prevention, and health promotion, remain scarce. This study aims to (a) compare HL across these three domains in individuals with chronic somatic illness, chronic mental illness and those without any chronic illness, (b) to explore where difficulties in managing health-related information occur and how these differ between groups, and (c) to analyze the relationship between demographic, social, and psychological factors and HL. Methods: Data from a quantitative cross-sectional survey in Germany were stratified according to respondents with at least one chronic somatic illness, at least one chronic mental illness and without chronic illness. The survey was conducted by means of paper-assisted personal interviews. HL was measured in three domains health care, disease prevention and health promotion. Age, educational level, social status, financial resources, number of chronic illnesses, social support, and self-efficacy were included in the analysis as potential determinants of HL. Differences between groups were analyzed using bivariate statistics; multiple linear regressions were calculated to examine relationships between potential determinants and HL. Results: Respondents with chronic mental illness showed lowest HL, followed by those with chronic somatic illness. Respondents without chronic illness achieved highest HL. This pattern was consistent across all three HL domains. Among all groups, HL was lowest in the domain of health promotion. Notable differences emerged in perceived difficulties, with respondents with mental illnesses reporting the most significant challenges. Self-efficacy and education level showed a positive association with HL across all groups, while social support was positively associated with HL among individuals with chronic mental illness. For respondents with chronic somatic illness, age was negatively associated with HL, whereas social status showed a positive association. Female respondents without chronic illness and those with chronic somatic illness demonstrated higher HL compared to male respondents. Conclusion: This study advances the understanding of HL among individuals with chronic illness and highlights the need for a greater differentiation among disease groups and HL domains in future research. Particular attention should be paid to people with chronic mental illness, whose lower HL levels increase their vulnerability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».