South Asia in the First Quarter of the 21st Century
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The first and the second editions of the South Asian Economic Development (SAED) were published, respectively, in 1999 and 2010. Both the editions enjoyed highly satisfactory demand from users all over the world, most importantly in the UK, US, and EU nations. Both the editions have attracted reviews from top international journals on development and regional studies. The concluding quarter of the 20th century has been a ‘golden era’ for South Asia, both politically and economically. Politically, on the one hand, the region remained calm except for a civil war, which continued for more than 30 years in Sri Lanka. India and Pakistan have remained relatively calm with only a few border skirmishes. In Bangladesh, surprisingly, two warring political parties took turns winning general elections in 1991 and 1996 after almost two decades of autocratic military rule from 1975 to 1990. Calm in the political arena in India and Pakistan has contributed to steady growth in these economies since 1990, which resulted in good progress towards achieving high levels of development activities. Also, in Bangladesh and Pakistan, after years of military rules, state power was transferred to civil politicians through legitimate democratic processes. The chapters of the first edition in 1999 carried out materials about economic transformation, opportunities, and challenges of the four South Asian nations over the immediate past two decades. The second edition was published in 2009, covering the early period of MDGs and the development impacts on South Asia. The first edition had enjoyed high demand from users, as suggested earlier, which made Routledge invite the authors to work for the second edition within a limited time frame. It appears now that the second edition had enjoyed good user demand too, over a longer period, 2009–2020. This has made Routledge, once again, invite the authors to begin work on the third edition by January 2023. In one count it shows, more than 500 libraries worldwide are now the home of both hard and soft copies of the second edition. The third edition, of course, as readers and followers of SAED over the last two decades would know, is going to be challenging as far as the development of these four countries of South Asia is concerned. During the COVID-19 period, South Asian economies have been shattered like the rest of the world. In addition, due to the global impact of the war between Ukraine and Russia, South Asian nations have been suffering too from the oil supply crisis and the grain import issues and so on. An in-depth analysis of the effects of these major issues on the four economies, which carry almost one-third of the world population, especially immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic, certainly has been challenging. Thus, the concluding chapter remains cautious about predicting the second quarter of the 21st century.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,039 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».