Reciprocal contributions: Indigenous perspectives and voices on marine‐coastal experiences in the channels of northern Patagonia, Chile
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The recovery of marine ecosystems in areas heavily impacted by fishing and environmental exploitation depends, to some extent, on the sustainable management of resources and should be complemented by cultural traditions, practices and scientific knowledge. These knowledge systems may involve reciprocal actions and interactions between people and coastal environments, which, unfortunately, are often overlooked in government coastal management strategies. Our study was conducted in the channels and fjords of northern Chilean Patagonia. The life experiences of nine community members, some of whom are co‐authors of this article, involve reciprocal interactions with coastal areas and species. We highlight two customary practices that are important for food sovereignty and the responsible management of marine‐coastal ecosystems. To understand their perspectives on nature, we analysed the ontological and cosmogonic aspects of these practices, their ecological implications and the challenges they currently face. We present two case studies: (i) the ‘Corralitos de pirenes’ in the Chiloé archipelago, which refers to small stone walls or enclosures built in the intertidal zone to create a suitable habitat for rockfish to spawn. The community consumes a percentage of the fish eggs, and the fish benefit by having a protected spawning site maintained by the locals; (ii) ‘benthic rearrangements,’ a practice carried out by shellfish divers who manually restructure underwater substrates that have been depleted by overexploitation of artisanal fishing. To this end, they manually relocate various species to re‐establish their ecological interactions. Both cases demonstrate a deep, place‐based ecological knowledge that fosters an understanding of ecosystems and fishing management rooted in the coastal families. These practices have been developed within family and community contexts and are continuously passed down through generations. These experiences embody a biocultural ethic that must be recognized, valued and expanded upon. Their ecological contributions (e.g. improvement of habitats) and socioecological endeavours (care for the environment) aim to foster biocultural continuity, engaging the elderly, adults and children. These experiences occur in a scenario of socio‐environmental crises where industries, such as salmon farming, generate cultural and ecological impacts that intertwine both in time and within the depths of the sea. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».