Assessing Pulmonary Function in Children and Adolescents After Cancer Treatment: Protocol for a Multicenter Cohort Study (Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study FollowUp–Pulmo)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at risk of pulmonary dysfunction due to cancer treatments, but evidence on prevalence and risk factors remains limited. Most previous studies had small sample sizes or retrospective study designs, little information about treatments, or a lack of standardization of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) or limited their investigation to certain PFTs. Since spirometry mainly assesses the large airways but cancer therapy also affects peripheral airways, additional functional tests are needed. The nitrogen multiple breath washout test (N2MBW) is sensitive to peripheral airway damage in other patient populations, but its benefit in CCS is unknown. Therefore, comprehensive and standardized evaluation of pulmonary function after cancer treatment in childhood, using different PFTs that include N2MBW, is needed to address these knowledge gaps and provide insights into possible early stages of pulmonary dysfunction. Objective In the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS) FollowUp–Pulmo, we will comprehensively assess lung function in children and adolescents after treatment for cancer to identify risk factors for pulmonary dysfunction, assess the ability of N2MBW to detect pulmonary dysfunction compared to other PFTs, and investigate the association of functional outcomes from PFTs with self-reported respiratory symptoms. Methods SCCSS FollowUp–Pulmo is a prospective multicenter longitudinal cohort study embedded in routine clinical care that enrolls CCS aged 6-20 years for whom at least 1 year has passed since a childhood cancer diagnosis, who have completed treatment, and who attend regular pediatric oncological follow-up care. Inclusion criteria comprise any of the following: systemic anticancer treatment (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted agents), thoracic surgery, thoracic radiotherapy, or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). CCS undergo a standardized pulmonary assessment, including spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and N2MBW, and complete a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms and lifestyle. Data from previous and subsequent routine care PFTs will be included in this study. Results Recruitment started in June 2022 at the University Children’s Hospital Bern, Switzerland. Subsequently, patient recruitment expanded to the University Children’s Hospitals in Basel and Geneva, Switzerland. By October 2024, we had invited 220 patients, of which 201 have already participated in this study, resulting in a response rate of 91%. Their median age at the time of the study was 14 years (IQR 10-17), and the median time since diagnosis was 7 years (IQR 4-10). The study will continuously enroll new CCS. Conclusions This study will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of pulmonary function in CCS and assess related risk factors, as well as the utility of N2MBW compared to other PFTs. The results will assist in the development of more targeted screening and risk-stratified follow-up care. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04732273; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04732273 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/69743
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,021 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».