Editorial: Exercise and transplant sport—the journey to a more active life
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The goal of this special issue was to further our knowledge of exercise related responses in 13 organ-recipients from rehabilitation to competitive sport. The studies presented indeed reflect 14 our aim considering organ recipients over the first 12 months post-transplantation (Vecchiato et 15 al, 2024) to those competing nationally and internationally (Hames et al, 2024) and the support 16 received at such events (Duncan et al, 2024). Furthermore, the impact of high intensity training 17 was reviewed (Kayeye et al, 2024) and the utility of web-based exercise and training resources 18(Da Silva et al, 2024) and telehealth monitoring (Vecchiato et al, 2024) joy, hope and celebration of life to the complex interplay between gratitude and guilt, an aspect 69 that is not generally experienced in other competitions. With the health vulnerabilities of the 70 population, the service placed well-being first and performance second, with priority given to 71 listening to athletes' stories. The resultant emotional experiences of the group and emotional 72 labour of the Games placed considerable importance on peer supervision. Practical aspects of 73 signposting, access to the service and finding a quiet space for consultations at a live event 74were highlighted. For trainees the service provided an opportunity to work with a broader client 75 base than may usually be experienced. However, this re-emphasises the need for greater 76 resources, for athletes, early career practitioners and those new to working with organ 77 recipients, enabling volunteers to be fully prepared for supporting all involved. 78The need for clear educational resources is addressed by Da Silva et al (2024) in examining 79 online content and quality of website and video resources relating to physical activity, with a 80 focus on promoting engagement and adherence to activity post-transplant. Of the 49 resources 81 included, most were of low quality, understandability and actionability. More comprehensive 82 content scores were noted for resources from Foundations and advocacy websites than for 83 scientific organisations and news/media articles. Importantly, balanced and unbiased 84 information was frequently observed, although only the minority of sources discussed safety 85 and educational aspects, lacking in additional resources for reference. 86Overall, the studies comprising this special issue have demonstrated diverse interdisciplinary 87 work, utilising collaborative partnerships across aspects of applied research and practice. As practitioners and researchers in this area, we are responsible not only for ensuring integration of 89 this research into practice, but also facilitating future, truly international collaborations. The ball 90 is firmly in our court to enhance such developments as well as high quality resources for organ 91 recipients and those professionals beginning their practice journey within this population. 92 93 94
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,014 | 0,018 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».