MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4408147905 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.03.25323223

Serotype-specific pneumococcal invasiveness: a global meta-analysis of paired estimates of disease incidence and carriage prevalence

2025· preprint· en· W4408147905 sur OpenAlexaff
Katherine E. Gallagher, Fredrick Odiwour, Christian Bottomley, John Ojal, Aisha Adamu, Esther Muthumbi, E. Wangeci Kagucia, Laura L Hammitt, Sérgio Massora, Betuel Sigaúque, Alberto Chaúque, Leocadia Vilanculos, Jennifer R. Verani, Maria da Glória Carvalho, Anne von Gottberg, Jackie Kleynhans, Shabir A. Madhi, Courtney P. Olwagen, Grant Mackenzie, Rasheed Salaudeen, Ryan Gierke, Miwako Kobayashi, Stephen I. Pelton, Inci Yildrim, Stepy Thomas, Amy Tunali, Monica M. Farley, Todd D. Swarthout, Akuzike Kalizang’oma, Robert S. Heyderman, Neil French, Yoon Hong Choi, Nick Andrews, Shamez Ladhani, Elizabeth Miller, J. Anthony G. Scott

Notice bibliographique

RevuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Établissements canadiensInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Organismes subventionnairesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionWellcome Trust
Mots-clésCarriageSerotypeIncidence (geometry)Pneumococcal diseaseMeta-analysisDiseaseMedicineBiologyVirologyStreptococcus pneumoniaeMicrobiologyInternal medicinePathologyMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Serotype-specific estimates of pneumococcal invasiveness used in pneumococcal carriage transmission models to predict changes in disease incidence post-vaccination are largely derived from high-income settings. We conducted a systematic review of carriage prevalence and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) incidence to calculate case-carrier ratios (CCRs) in different income settings. Methods A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Global Health databases in March 2022 identified publications on pneumococcal carriage prevalence or IPD incidence; we requested individual-level data from authors of relevant texts. Serotype-specific CCRs, calculated as IPD incidence divided by carriage prevalence, were pooled across settings using random effects meta-analyses, stratified by pre-/post-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) introduction, country income group, age-group, sex and HIV status. Findings We identified 80 publications from 18 countries (13 upper-middle- or high-income countries (UM/HIC), 5 low/lower-middle income (L/LMIC)) reporting carriage prevalence or IPD incidence in overlapping geographical areas, time periods, and age-groups. We calculated CCRs for >70 serotypes, stratified by age group, income settings, and pre- and post-vaccine introduction. In children under five, pre-PCV CCRs for serotypes not included in the 20-valent PCV were higher in L/LMICs than UM/HICs, 152 (95% Confidence interval 103-226) versus 102 (50-209). Post-PCV CCRs for non-vaccine serotypes dropped in UM/HICs but not in L/LMICs, 19 (16-22) versus 154 (119-200) respectively. Pre-/post PCV changes varied by serotype and age-group. CCRs were lowest in 5–14-year-olds and were higher in HIV positive than HIV negative individuals. There were no differences in CCRs by sex. Interpretation Pneumococcal invasiveness varies by serotype, age-group, country income-group, HIV status and over time; however, substantial variation remained unexplained. Our CCRs represent the most representative estimates of invasiveness currently available for use in statistical or mathematical prediction models of disease incidence, where only carriage prevalence data are available. Funding The Wellcome Trust, Great Britain (098532) Panel: Research in context Evidence before this study There are three estimates of the absolute risk of invasive pneumococcal disease, given carriage, derived from data from high-income settings (two studies in the UK, and one in the USA). A fourth set of estimates have been derived from data collated by a recent review of studies that reported both carriage and IPD data in the same publication. This review and re-analysis combined data from 12 countries to report case-carrier ratios in children under-5, pre- and post-vaccine introduction. The review did not include data from IPD surveillance sites in low- and middle-income countries, nor carriage prevalence data in adults. Added value of this study We conducted an extensive systematic review to identify high quality IPD incidence estimates and a comprehensive database of carriage prevalence estimates that arise from the same country, age-group and time period as these IPD incidence estimates. We employed stringent matching criteria to only include the results of carriage surveys that were conducted in a random sample of the general population, and IPD surveillance activities that were conducted in a systematic way across a defined population. This enabled us to estimate serotype-specific pneumococcal case-carrier ratios, stratified by age group, country income group, and time period pre- or post-vaccine introduction. Implications of all the available evidence Invasive pneumococcal disease surveillance is resource intensive to establish and sustain and is therefore infeasible for most countries worldwide. Pneumococcal vaccine policy is often made on the basis of carriage data alone, or mathematical models which predict changes in disease incidence by combining changes in carriage prevalence with pre-specified case-carrier ratios. We have used all available data globally to estimate serotype-specific case-carrier ratios, which previously have been derived from data from high income settings. Both statistical and mathematical models predicting changes in disease incidence in low-income settings, can now utilise case-carrier ratios from more relevant population groups. This will be of increasing importance as policy makers attempt to make evidence-based decisions on whether to change pneumococcal vaccine product, schedule, or simply increase coverage of the existing programme.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,031
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: Méta-analyse
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,162

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0310,062
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0040,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0210,066
Bibliométrie0,0080,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,071
Tête enseignante GPT0,334
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuemedRxiv→Même sujetPneumonia and Respiratory Infections→Travaux en français237 207→