MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4408206998 · doi:10.3389/fspas.2025.1579994

Editorial: Past, present and future of multispacecraft measurements for space physics

2025· editorial· en· W4408206998 sur OpenAlexaff
K. Nykyri, X. Blanco‐Cano, D. J. Knudsen, D. G. Sibeck, Joseph E. Borovsky

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesNuclear Safety and Security CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
Mots-clésPhysicsSpace (punctuation)Space physicsTheoretical physicsAstronomy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The curlometer and spatial gradient based methods are comprehensively reviewed by Dunlop et al. (2024).These techniques are adaptable to a range of multi-point and multi-scale arrays, originally developed for ESA's Cluster mission, but later adapted for Swarm and MMS. The authors note that "multi-spacecraft estimates of current density and spatial gradients have provided key information on large and small magnetospheric current systems and related transient structures, resolving 3-D currents for a range of conditions in widely different geospace regions. The curlometer technique, in particular, has proved to be reliable and robust. The applicability of the method is limited by certain constraints, particularly those for relatively small structures compared to the spacecraft separation distances." The authors discuss the further adaptations of these techniques for future constellation missions such as Helioswarm and Plasma Observatory.A thorough review of solar energetic particle measurements both from historical and current missions, together with the outlook for future missions are given by Reames (2023). The author recommends that physics of SEPs may require a return to the closer spacing of the Helios era with coverage 27 mapped by a half-dozen spacecraft to help disentangle the distribution of the SEPs from the underlying 28 structure of the magnetic field and the accelerating shock".The Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability (KHI), arising from a velocity shear across a plasma boundary, plays a 30 crucial role in plasma, momentum, and energy transfer, e.g., from the shocked solar wind into the planetary 31 magnetospheres and at the boundaries of Coronal Mass Ejections (see e.g., Nykyri et al. (2021); Nykyri 32 (2024) and references therein). a robust vortex detection method by spacecraft has been missing.Here, Kelly et al. (2024) develop and validate a novel vortex identification method for ideal MHD, based 2024) present a gradient calculation method for the upcoming, six-spacecraft Geospace 59 Dynamics Constellation (GDC) mission, which will investigate dynamical processes in Earth's upper 60 atmosphere. Achieving this goal will involve resolving and distinguishing spatial and temporal variability 61 of ionospheric and thermospheric structures in a quantitative manner. Specifically, this paper implements 62 the least-squares gradient calculation approach previously developed by J. De Keyser. The authors conclude 63 that: "1) computation of the temporal gradients of neutral and plasma variables, while sensitive to the 64 measurement noise level, are possible with GDC measurements; 2) The spatial gradients of the equatorial 65 ionization anomaly can be reasonably resolved during phase 1 of the mission, while at the later phases 66 the gradients are likely to be underestimated. On the other hand, in the presence of measurement noise, al.computing the gradients of the neutral temperature would likely be more difficult in the earliest phases of 68 the mission due to the small gradients and large homogeneity lengths involved; 3) Gradients of the neutral 69 wind can be well determined in the earliest phases of the mission even at the highest latitudes where the 70 constellation skews in longitude." 71 Oberheide et al. (2023) discuss how the GDC mission can be used to resolve tidal weather. The GDC 72 mission measures neutral temperatures and winds and thus likely enable significant progress towards 73 resolving the tidal weather of the thermosphere and how it is driven by meteorological processes near the 74 surface and in situ forcing in the ionosphere-thermosphere system. The authors demonstrate that GDC can 75 resolve the day-to-day tidal variability (mean, diurnal and semidiurnal, migrating and nonmigrating) at 76 orbit height during the mission. They note that the "mean state of thermosphere can also be recovered on a 77 day-to-day basis throughout mission phases 3 and 4, including the mean meridional circulation".In an opinion article, Weimer (2024) argue that the significance of the small-scale electric fields in 79 the polar ionosphere may be overestimated. This somewhat contradicts earlier studies that highlight the 80 importance of correctly capturing the variability of the electric fields in the models to accurately account 81 for the total amount of Joule heating. The authors conclude that future multi-spacecraft measurements 82 in the polar ionosphere, such as the future GDC mission, will be able to address this issue, "with some 83 limitations due to missing double-probes". The extent, to which these can be accomplished in the next decade depends on the funding level of the 96 associated agencies: NASA, NSF and NOAA as well as their international counterparts, and on the state of 97 a healthy and educated workforce.KN wrote the initial draft of the editorial, all authors helped in commenting and editing of the editorial.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,078

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0060,005
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0110,015
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0230,021

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in Astronomy and Space SciencesMême sujetIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsTravaux en français237 207