Effects of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) program on the health behaviours of older adults residing in social housing: secondary outcomes of a cluster-randomized trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Community-dwelling, low-income older adults who reside in social housing are a vulnerable population with high rates of poor health behaviours that contribute to chronic health conditions and adverse health outcomes. This study investigates the impact of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic), a chronic disease prevention, management, and health promotion program, on the health behaviours of this population. METHODS: An open-label, pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with parallel intervention and control groups was conducted for one-year within 30 social housing buildings in Ontario, Canada. Eligible buildings were required to have a postal code not shared with other addresses, a majority of tenants aged 55 years or older, at least 50 units, and a similar building available for matching. Buildings were paired and randomized to either intervention (CP@clinic program) or control (usual care) groups. The CP@clinic program was conducted in the common spaces of the intervention buildings and consisted of weekly drop-in sessions facilitated by trained community paramedics. Older adults met one-on-one with community paramedics who conducted evidence-based risk assessments, made referrals to community and healthcare resources, provided health education, and reported health assessment results back to family physicians. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic characteristics and health behaviours. Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to compare individual-level change in health behaviours between intervention and control groups. RESULTS: From the 15 intervention and 15 control buildings, 656 participants completed either the pre- and/or post-intervention survey; the mean age was 72.1 (SD 8.7) years, 75.6% were female, 91.6% were not married, 89% were white, 68.4% obtained a high school education or less, and 90% lived alone. After the intervention, the individual-level consumption of weekly fruit and vegetables and time spent watching TV improved significantly (p < 0.05) for the intervention group compared to the control group (z-scores = -2.467 and -2.194, respectively). The change in consumption of carbohydrate/grains increased significantly for the intervention group compared to the control group (z-score -2.023, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The CP@clinic program is an innovative wellness program that had a significant impact in changing health behaviours, especially in weekly fruit and vegetable consumption, among a vulnerable older adult population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02152891, registered June 6, 2014.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».