Navigating Equitable Access to Cancer and Mental Health Services During Pandemics: Stakeholder Perspectives on COVID-19 Challenges and Community-Based Solutions for Immigrants and Refugees—Proceedings from Think Tank Sessions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Increasing evidence shows that the COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted certain populations, particularly those facing structural marginalization, such as immigrants and refugees. Additionally, research highlights that structurally marginalized populations living with chronic conditions, such as cancer and/or mental health and addiction (MH&A) disorders, are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of COVID-19. These individuals face higher susceptibility to infection and worse health outcomes, including increased rates of hospitalization, severe illness, and death. To better understand the challenges faced by people living at the intersection of social and clinical disadvantages, we organized a series of Think Tank sessions to engage stakeholders in exploring barriers and identifying community-based solutions for immigrants and refugees living with cancer and/or MH&A disorders during the current and future pandemics. Objectives: Our main objectives were to gauge how earlier findings resonated with stakeholders, to identify any gaps in the work, and to co-develop actionable solutions to safeguard health and well-being during COVID-19 and future crises. Methods: Two virtual Think Tank sessions were held in September 2023 as integrative knowledge exchange forums. The Cancer Think Tank was attended by 40 participants, while the MH&A disorders Think Tank included 41 participants. Each group comprised immigrants and refugees living with or affected by cancer (in the Cancer Think Tank) or MH&A disorders (in the MH&A disorders Think Tank), alongside service providers, policymakers, and researchers from Ontario. This paper presents the key discussions and outcomes of these sessions. Results: Participants identified and prioritized actionable strategies during the Think Tank sessions. In the Cancer Think Tank, participants emphasized the importance of leveraging foreign-trained healthcare providers to address workforce shortages, creating clinical health ambassadors to bridge gaps in care, and connecting immigrants with healthcare providers immediately upon their arrival in Canada. In the MH&A disorders Think Tank, participants highlighted the need to remove silos by fostering intersectoral collaboration, empowering communities and building capacity to support mental health, and moving away from one-size-fits-all approaches to develop tailored interventions that better address diverse needs. Conclusions: The Think Tank sessions enhanced our understanding of how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted immigrants and refugees living with cancer and/or MH&A disorders. The insights gained informed a series of actionable recommendations to address the unique needs of these populations during the current pandemic and in future public health crises.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,038 | 0,030 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,023 | 0,013 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,021 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».