Understanding wellbeing from the perspectives of First Nations Australian youth: Findings from a national qualitative study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Measures of wellbeing are increasingly used to inform critical decision making to support young people across a range of areas, including health, education, and programs and services that support them. Wellbeing is a culturally bound construct; therefore, robust wellbeing measures must ask about topics that are culturally relevant to and valued by the population of interest. Despite this, little attention has been directed at understanding the components of wellbeing relevant to, and valued by, First Nations youth. This project aims to redress this gap through a large national study conducted to gather the views of First Nations youth (aged 12-17 years) about what supports their wellbeing. First Nations youth were recruited in collaboration with partner organisations between May 2021 and September 2022 to participate in a PhotoYarning study (a combination of Photovoice and Yarning methodologies). Participants were given digital cameras, asked to take photos relevant to their wellbeing and then joined Yarning Circles to share and discuss the photos and their wellbeing. Yarning Circles were analysed using a strength based lens within a Collaborative Yarning approach. A total of 172 youth participated in one of 17 Yarning Circles sharing over 550 photographs. Analysis revealed an interconnected set of six themes foundational to their wellbeing, including: having a sense of belonging; feeling connected with others; receiving care and self-care; doing activities you enjoy; working towards goals and achievements; and having access to safe spaces . These findings provide a substantial foundation for building an understanding of wellbeing for First Nations youth, which can then form the basis of robust wellbeing measures, interventions, and programs to more effectively meet their wellbeing needs. • The study used a strengths-based Indigenist research approach, guided by the key principle of prioritising and privileging the voices and perspectives of First Nations youth. • PhotoYarning, an adaptation of Photovoice and Yarning methodologies, was used to explore what is important to, and impacts on, the wellbeing of First Nations youth. • First Nations youth were self-aware of fluctuations in their own wellbeing, the factors that support their wellbeing, and the value of striving for good wellbeing. • Six interconnected themes emerged across the parts of life that support the wellbeing of First Nations youth.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».