Comparison of the Human Plasma Peptides from the Fit of Fragmentation Spectra versus Accurate Monoisotopic Precursor Mass
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In nature, ionized peptides with heavy isotopes and hydrogen rearrangements show a broad mass distribution with signals at discrete delta mass values from −3 to +5 Da by mass spectrometry (MS). For many peptides, the intensity of the +1 or +2 Da isotope exceeds the signal from the monoisotopic mass. Therefore, there is a need for a method that improves peptide identification from heavy isotopes or hydrogen rearrangements based on the fit of tandem mass spectra. Peptides may be identified using an accurate monoisotopic precursor mass with ≤0.1 Da. However, many peptides with heavy isotopes and H-loss can be identified and enumerated based on the fit of their MS/MS spectra alone in the absence of an accurate precursor monoisotopic mass (i.e., ± 3 Da) using the X!TANDEM MS/MS fitting algorithm. In this study, human plasma samples were analyzed with a highly resolving axially harmonic orbital ion trap (OIT) and a sensitive linear quadrupole ion trap (LIT). The MS/MS fragmentation spectra from the OIT can be fit to peptides from the monoisotopic (±0.1 Da) as well as all other precursor masses with a wide mass tolerance (±3 Da). The resulting delta mass distribution can then be plotted and compared to the predicted distribution of heavy isotopes and hydrogen rearrangements to provide a direct biophysical prediction and test the validity of the fit determined by accepting the best-fit MS/MS spectra. The OIT instrument, which has greater resolution, was sampled at 30 nL per minute, while the more sensitive LIT was sampled at 200 nL per minute. The MS/MS spectra generated by each instrument were fit to peptides within a wide window (±3 Da) using the rigorous X!TANDEM algorithm. The OIT and LIT results were compared in an SQL Server database and corrected against analytical and statistical controls. The delta mass distribution of the peptides with hydrogen rearrangements and heavy isotopes was determined from the fit MS/MS spectra using the R statistical program. The OIT sampled MS and MS/MS spectra from the high-intensity precursor ions by focusing on E7 to E9 detector counts. In contrast, the LIT sampled a range of precursor ion intensities focused from E4 to E7 and thus reached lower ion intensity values. As expected, the precursor mass [M + H] + obtained by the OIT exhibited sharp delta mass peaks at −3, −2, −1, 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, and +5 Da due to naturally occurring heavy isotopes and hydrogen rearrangements. The collection of peptides and proteins identified by OIT and LIT was in qualitative and quantitative agreement with one another, with 99.9% overlap on 2726 protein gene symbols from human plasma and a highly significant relationship by regression analysis. The protein p -values, false discovery rate q -values, and comparisons to the noise MS/MS analytical control and random MS/MS statistical control confirmed the high-confidence MS/MS identifications from both instruments. MS/MS fragmentation spectra from the OIT were fit to peptides. The resulting precursor ion delta mass distribution showed a precise match to the predicted isotope distributions and hydrogen rearrangements of natural peptides. Thus, analysis of delta mass plots provided powerful biophysical evidence for the accuracy of plasma peptide identification from the fit of the MS/MS spectra alone. The high level of agreement on proteins and peptides and the proportional enumeration between proteins identified by the OIT and those identified independently using a LIT confirmed that plasma peptides and proteins may be identified and quantified from MS/MS spectra alone without the need for an accurate measure of the precursor mass. The greater sensitivity and low cost of searching MS/MS spectra in the absence of an accurate mass mean that it is possible to identify and quantify more proteins for the discovery of proteins in clinical populations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».