MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4408326634 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf118

Epicardial adipose tissue and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in phospholamban p.(Arg14del) variant carriers

2025· article· en· W4408326634 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Belend Mahmoud, Moniek G.P.J. Cox, Remco de Brouwer, M Heide, Thomas M. Gorter, Laura M G Meems, Arthur A.M. Wilde, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Rudolf A. de Boer, B. Daan Westenbrink

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesEuropean Research CouncilUniversitair Medisch Centrum GroningenFondation Leducq
Mots-clésMedicinePhospholambanAdipose tissueInternal medicineCardiologyEpicardial adipose tissueHeart failure

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The pathogenic p.(Arg14del) variant in the phospholamban (PLN) gene can cause a severe cardiomyopathy characterized by a high burden of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (MVA).1,2 A considerable, yet poorly understood heterogeneity in the burden of arrhythmias is observed among individuals with this variant.3 Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has recently emerged as a potential driver of arrhythmogenicity.4 While associations between EAT and atrial fibrillation have already been established,5,6 the relationship between EAT and ventricular arrhythmias remains poorly understood. We conducted a retrospective association study to assess whether ventricular EAT volume is associated with the incidence of MVA in individuals with the PLN p.(Arg14del) variant. Individuals with the PLN p.(Arg14del) variant with a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan available at the University Medical Centre Groningen were retrospectively included. Ventricular EAT volumes were measured manually using Circle Cardiovascular Imaging (Cvi42, version 5.14, Calgary, Canada) software, using a protocol described previously.7 The primary outcome was the incidence of MVA, defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), or appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock intervention. Patients with a history of MVA at baseline, inadequate MRI scan quality, or without follow-up, were excluded. The primary outcome was validated in a PLN p.(Arg14del) cohort from the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Figure 1A). (A) Simplified graphical visualization of the methodology, showing population, EAT measurement on MRI, and outcome. Epicardial adipose tissue measurement is depicted on one short-axis cine stack of the heart on MRI, basal slice. Red/Bold: myocardial border. Green: visceral layer of the pericardium. The space in between represents EAT. (B) Forest plot showing (adjusted) HR for EAT univariably, EAT adjusted for factors influencing EAT volume (Model 1), EAT adjusted for factors in the contemporary MVA risk prediction model8 (Model 2), EAT adjusted for all variables in Models 1 + 2 using a backward selection process, with HR only reported for the covariates that remained significant after the backward selection (Model 3). (C) Receiver operating characteristic curve and Harrell’s C-statistic assessing the discriminative ability of EAT for MVA. The arrow indicates the optimal cut-off point based on the Youden index. (D) Kaplan–Meier curve showing the event-free survival of MVA in the primary cohort, stratified by EAT volume, using the optimal cut-off calculated shown in C. (E) Kaplan–Meier curve showing the event-free survival of MVA in the validation cohort, stratified by EAT volume, using the optimal cut-off calculated shown in C. PLN, phospholamban gene; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MVA, malignant ventricular arrhythmia; BMI, body mass index; PVC, premature ventricular contraction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Adj.HR, adjusted hazard ratio Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median [interquartile range], or numbers (percentage). Variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U test, independent t-test, or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. Linear regression was used to assess correlations between EAT volume and 24 h premature ventricular contraction (PVC) count, and left and right ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF/RVEF). Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the association between EAT volume and MVA, using several models: Model 1, variables influencing EAT volume [age, body mass index (BMI), and sex]; Model 2, variables included in the contemporary MVA risk prediction model8; and Model 3, backward selection of all variables used in Models 1 and 2, with a threshold of P < .10 for covariate elimination. Hazard ratios (HRs) are reported for the covariates that remain significant after the backward selection. In the validation cohort, EAT volume was adjusted for the covariates that remained significant in the final survival model (Model 3). Harrell’s C-statistic was used to assess the discriminative ability of EAT volume for the MVA outcome. In both cohorts, patients were divided into ‘low EAT’ and ‘high EAT’ groups based on the optimal EAT volume cut-off point calculated using the Youden index. Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio (version 4.1.1, Vienna, Austria), with P < .05 considered significant. We included 184 patients (40 ± 15 years, 46.7% male). During 70 ± 35 months of follow-up, 19 (10.3%) patients developed MVA. Compared to those who did not develop MVA, these patients were older (48 ± 12 vs. 39 ± 15 years, P = .015), had higher BMI (26.9 ± 3.2 vs. 24.4 ± 3.9 kg/m2, P = .006), higher PVC count (2894 [1615–5068] vs. 70 [2–715], P < .001), more frequent microvoltage electrocardiograms (50% vs. 14%, P = .001), lower LVEF (36 [35–47] vs. 56 [52–61], P < .001), and higher ventricular EAT volumes (74.6 ± 18.6 vs. 49.4 ± 11.1 mL/m2, P < .001). Higher ventricular EAT volumes correlated with a higher PVC count (R2 = .229 for log10-PVC count, P < .001), lower LVEF (R2 = .427, P < .001), and lower RVEF (R2 = .337, P < .001). Every 10 mL/m2 increase in ventricular EAT was associated with a 97% higher incidence of MVA (P < .001). This association remained significant after adjusting for age, BMI, and sex (adjusted HR [adj.HR] 1.79 [1.48–2.37], P < .001), the current risk prediction model8 (adj.HR 1.97 [1.10–3.11], P = .015), and all aforementioned factors in a backward selection model (adj.HR 1.79 [1.48–2.37], P < .001) (Figure 1B and D). Epicardial adipose tissue volume had excellent discriminative ability to predict MVA, with a C-statistic value of 0.89 [0.82–0.95], which was similar to the current risk prediction model. The optimal EAT volume cut-off for MVA incidence was 55.6 mL/m2 (sensitivity 89%, specificity 74%) (Figure 1C). We included 96 patients (43 ± 15 years, 39.6% male). During 72 ± 38 months of follow-up, 15 patients (15.6%) developed MVA. These patients had higher ventricular EAT volumes than those who did not develop MVA (69.9 ± 18.6 vs. 47.7 ± 13.0 mL/m2, P < .001). In this cohort, EAT was also associated with MVA incidence after statistical adjustment (adj.HR 1.71 [1.36–2.12], P < .001) (Figure 1E). In subjects with the PLN p.(Arg14del) pathogenic variant, ventricular EAT accumulation was associated with a higher incidence of MVA in two independent cohorts, and this association remained present after adjustments. Moreover, ventricular EAT volume demonstrated excellent discriminative ability for MVA, equivalent to that of the current risk prediction model. These findings suggest that EAT accumulation increases susceptibility to MVA. This study is among the first and largest to associate EAT accumulation with MVA incidence. Three smaller studies have looked into this before. Sepehri Shamloo et al.9 found that EAT thickness predicted VT recurrence post-ablation. Wu et al.10 reported that higher pericardial fat volumes were linked to VT/VF occurrence in patients with heart failure. Wang et al.11 documented higher EAT volumes in patients with idiopathic VT compared to controls. Our study confirms and extends upon these findings by demonstrating this association in a large, homogeneous population with an identical genetic variant, without history of MVA, and substantial follow-up. Additionally, the multivariable adjustments and sizeable validation cohort provide a more robust link between EAT and MVA. Our results suggest that EAT may serve as a potential substrate for ventricular arrhythmias and therefore play a role in PLN cardiomyopathy pathogenesis. Due to its high predictive value for MVA and the fact that it is a single, easy to utilize variable, there is a strong case for incorporating ventricular EAT volume into the current risk prediction model. Additionally, the association between EAT and MVA could also exist in other populations, but future studies are required to investigate this assumption. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study, preventing us from ascertaining causality between EAT and outcomes. Additionally, differences in characteristics between patients who did and did not develop MVA, including age and cardiac function, could not be prevented and had to be accounted for through statistical adjustments. Ventricular EAT accumulation is associated with the incidence of MVA in subjects with the PLN p.(Arg14del) pathogenic variant. This suggests that EAT accumulation could contribute to ventricular arrhythmogenicity. We gratefully acknowledge Gijs van Woerden for providing expert training and guidance on EAT quantification. R.A.d.B. has received research grants and/or fees from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Novo Nordisk, and Roche; has had speaker engagements with and/or received fees from and/or served on an advisory board for Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior Pharmaceuticals GmbH, NovoNordisk, and Roche; and received travel support from Abbott, Cardior Pharmaceuticals GmbH, and NovoNordisk. The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. B.M., B.D.W., and R.A.d.B. are supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (CVON Double Dose, grant number 2020B005). Furthermore, B.D.W. is further supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (Senior Clinical Scientist Grant 2019T064), and the Partnership of UMCG–Siemens for building the future of Health (IPA 37 and IPA 39). R.A.d.B. is supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (grant numbers 2018-30, 01-003-2022-0358), the leDucq Foundation (Cure-PLaN), and by the European Research Council (ERC CoG 818715). Ethical approval was given for the Netherlands Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Registry (ACM Registry), Netherlands Trial Registry project 7097. None supplied.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,393
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,630

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Heart JournalMême sujetCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityTravaux en français237 207