Identification and Implications for Tumor Heterogeneity of a DNA Methylation-Based Signature Classifying Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Based on their Cellular Origin
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) arises from distinct cellular origins, yet the extent to which DNA methylation patterns from normal pancreatic cells are preserved in tumor cells remains unclear. Identifying cell-of-origin signatures may enhance PDAC classification and therapeutic stratification. Objective To determine whether DNA methylation signatures in normal acinar and ductal pancreatic cells are retained in PDAC cell lines and to develop a robust classifier for distinguishing tumor origins. Design We performed DNA methylation profiling using the Illumina Infinium Mouse MethylationEPIC array on normal acinar and ductal cells and their PDAC derivatives in genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs). Differential methylation analysis, and hierarchical clustering were used to identify and validate a conserved cell-of-origin DNA methylation signature. A logistic regression model was developed for classification. Results We identified 178 CpG sites that remain preserved during tumorigenesis and effectively distinguished acinar- and ductal-derived PDAC cell lines. This signature was validated across independent sample sets, primary tumors, and orthotopic allografts. It successfully classified cell lines of unknown origin, including PDAC samples from KPC mice, and revealed the impact of oncogenic mutations on tumor fate. A logistic regression model supported these findings, confirming the robustness of the classification approach. Furthermore, the cell of origin influenced key PDAC characteristics, including treatment response, highlighting its potential role in molecular subtyping and patient stratification. Conclusion A preserved DNA methylation signature during pancreatic carcinogenesis distinguishes PDAC origins and influences tumor behavior. These results highlight the potential of DNA methylation profiling for tumor classification and personalized treatment strategies. They also raise important questions about the relevance of KPC mice as a preclinical model and the mechanisms driving PDAC heterogeneity. What is already known on this topic Human PDAC exhibits significant heterogeneity, with molecular subtyping (classical vs basal-like) providing some insights into tumor behavior and clinical outcomes. Mouse acinar and ductal cells can give rise to PDAC, influencing tumor characteristics and survival outcomes. DNA methylation is a powerful tool for tracing cellular identity and distinguishing cancer subtypes based on epigenetic profiles. What this study adds A cell-of-origin methylation signature is preserved during mouse carcinogenesis and across diverse experimental settings, providing a reliable tool for tumor classification. A DNA methylation-based classification system reliably distinguishes between acinar- and ductal-origin PDAC, filling a critical gap in methods to trace tumor lineage. Acinar- and ductal-derived PDACs exhibit distinct methylation patterns that correlate with differences in tumor behavior, such as chemoresistance, highlighting the biological relevance of cellular origin in PDAC. The study provides new insights into how cell-of-origin influences PDAC heterogeneity and could lead to more precise therapeutic strategies tailored to the tumor’s lineage. How this study might affect research, practice or policy This study provides a new, reliable method for classifying PDAC based on its cellular origin, which could significantly improve tumor classification in both preclinical and clinical settings, aiding in more accurate diagnoses and prognostic predictions. The identification of distinct methylation patterns linked to tumor behavior offers valuable insights for developing personalized treatment strategies, as therapies could be tailored based on the tumor’s cellular origin and associated molecular characteristics. The preservation of cell-of-origin methylation signature suggests the potential for developing a universal biomarker for PDAC classification, which could guide future clinical trials, therapeutic targeting, and patient stratification in PDAC care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».