Relative socio-economic position and meaning and purpose in life in adolescents: An intangible cost of social inequalities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Having a sense of meaning in life supports adolescent health but is affected by the experiences of wealth or poverty. We examined its associations with relative advantage (RA) and relative deprivation (RD) in a sample of Canadian adolescents (n=17,634) using survey data from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study. We calculated RA and RD using all other schoolmates as reference groups in 238 schools. Descriptively, RA was associated with greater meaning and purpose and RD was associated with less. Regression-based estimates of prevalence ratios (PR) revealed more nuanced patterns. RD was associated with less of a sense of meaning and purpose in females and gender-diverse youth only. RA was associated with a risk of low meaning and purpose in females (PR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.98), with similar trends in males and gender diverse students that did not achieve significance. Although the association was not pronounced at the ecological (school) level, the negative associations with RD were stronger in more unequal schools. To illustrate, in schools of high wealth inequality, RD was most strongly associated with having low meaning and purpose in females (PR 1.59; 95% CI:1.20 to 2.11) and gender diverse adolescents (PR 1.97, 95% CI: 0.90 to 4.33), with no statistically significant effect in males. These patterns reveal the salience of proximal socioeconomic reference cues for adolescents and offer new insights into why inequalities in health and wellbeing are so challenging to address in youth populations. They also underscore the importance of both socioeconomic position and wealth distribution within school settings, providing impetus for thought and change. • Having a sense of meaning and purpose in life is an intangible resource that supports adolescent health • This national study demonstrates that having a sense of meaning and purpose in life is unequally distributed in adolescent populations • Girls and gender-diverse youth in a position of relative deprivation compared to all other schoolmates reported lower meaning and purpose in life • Adolescents who were relatively advantaged compared to all other schoolmates reported a higher sense of meaning and purpose in life • The negative effects of relative deprivation were especially pronounced in schools of high wealth inequality
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».