Is Childhood IgA Nephropathy Different From Adult IgA Nephropathy? A Narrative Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose of the review: Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerular kidney disease. Children and adults are presumed to have the same disease and are treated similarly. However, there are differences between childhood IgAN and adult IgAN that may require unique treatment considerations, even after transition to adult nephrology services. A narrative review was conducted to compare childhood and adult IgAN and to describe the distinct characteristics of childhood IgAN. Reframing childhood IgAN can inform guideline recommendations unique to childhood IgAN, the development of targeted therapies, and clinical trial design. Sources of information: Medline and Embase were searched for reports on children and adults with IgAN published between January 2013 and December 2023 (updated May 2024). The search was not restricted by age group, outcomes reported, language, or study design. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, review articles, and nephrology conference abstracts were included. A total of 3104 reports were retrieved. Forty-seven reports (37 primary studies and 10 reviews) were included in the review. Two RCTs and 35 observational studies included a total of 45 085 participants (9223 children and 35 862 adults). Method: Data were extracted for primary IgAN and not for IgA vasculitis–associated nephritis. Findings were described with no statistical comparisons due to variations in interventions and outcome definitions. Key findings: Gross hematuria was the obvious clinical difference between childhood IgAN and adult (60-88% vs 15-20%). Nephrotic syndrome was more common in children, approaching up to 44%, while <18% of adults had nephrotic syndrome. Children were biopsied sooner (6 vs 15 months) and had more inflammatory kidney lesions (mesangial hypercellularity: 41-82% vs 38-64%; endocapillary hypercellularity: 39-58% vs 17-34%). Chronic kidney lesions were more prevalent in adults (segmental sclerosis: 62-77% vs 8-51%; interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy: 34-37% vs 1-18%). The use of immunosuppressive therapy was higher in children (46-84% vs 35-56%). Children were started on immunosuppressive therapy sooner than adults. Adults were more likely to be optimized with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (87-94% vs 49-75%). Children had better kidney function than adults at diagnosis (estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90-128 vs 50-88 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ), and children also had better kidney survival, with kidney failure of 3.1% vs 13.4% at 5 years. Children had more risk alleles for IgAN and higher levels of mannose-binding lectin than adults. Limitations: Most studies were retrospective and observational, with limited data on children and disease mechanisms. Data were not pooled for analysis because of important differences in definitions and measurements of baseline characteristics and outcomes. Data from countries with established urine screening programs were different compared to countries without urine screening programs. Some observed differences may be due to practice variation and delayed diagnosis in adults (lead-time bias). Well-designed prospective studies and standardized measures for kidney function assessment and outcomes can reduce heterogeneity and improve results from reviews. Conclusion: Inherent differences between childhood IgAN and adult IgAN may be due to distinct disease mechanisms. Approaching childhood IgAN as a separate condition could lead to the discovery of targeted therapies and improve management during childhood and after the transition to adult care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,028 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».