Factors that promote success in a maternal-child program serving Indigenous families: a community-based participatory research project in Northern Saskatchewan, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: Despite investment in maternal-child health programs, there has been little impact on the health outcomes of Indigenous mothers and their children, creating a need to understand how programs can be successfully implemented. Community input is essential for successful programs; however, there is little research exploring the perspectives of frontline workers providing these programs. To gain a better understanding of how to support maternal-child health program success a research partnership was formed with the KidsFirst North program in Northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Using a community-based participatory research approach, this study was codeveloped to (1) explore families', frontline workers', and administrators' perceptions of factors that contribute to the success and barriers of a program for Indigenous families; and (2) describe the current role of frontline workers within health program planning, implementation, and evaluation. METHODS: From September 2019 to January 2020, data were collected through in-person meetings, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews with KidsFirst North families (n=9), frontline workers (n=18), and administrators (n=7) from 11 sites in Northern Saskatchewan. Data were analyzed using the Collective Consensual Data Analytic Procedure. RESULTS: The identified factors of program success included the importance of staff, where staff demonstrated certain positive characteristics and created a welcoming atmosphere for families; community events that were open to the entire community; and the integration of Indigenous culture in the program. Program barriers included jurisdictional policy that negatively impacted frontline workers, a lack of father inclusion in program activities, and community challenges such as a lack of access to other services within the community. All frontline workers had a role in program delivery, most reported involvement in program development and planning, and approximately half were included in program evaluation. CONCLUSION: Factors of success and barriers from the KidsFirst North project have illustrated elements to build on and areas to address in public health program planning, implementation, and evaluation of maternal-child health programs that serve Indigenous families. KidsFirst North has demonstrated ways a contemporary maternal-child health program can utilize frontline workers outside of program delivery to influence all aspects of health program planning, implementation, and evaluation. Contributing to the evidence base of maternal-child health programs for Indigenous families may help foster the success of public health programs; inform the role of frontline workers in health program planning, implementation, and evaluation; and positively impact the health of Indigenous children and families.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».