Biotic and physical drivers of fire in northwestern Patagonia
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Understanding the drivers of fire is frequently challenging because some of them interact and influence each other. In particular, vegetation type is a strong control of fire activity, but at the same time it responds to physical and human factors that also affect fire, so their effects are often confounded. We developed a 30 m resolution record of fire for northwestern Patagonia spanning 24 years (July 1998 - June 2022), and present an updated description of fire patterns and drivers. We analysed interannual variation in fire activity in relation to interannual climatic variation, and assessed how topography, precipitation, and human factors determine spatial patterns of fire either directly or by affecting the distribution of vegetation types along physical and human-influence gradients. Results We mapped 234 fires ≥ 10 ha that occurred between 1999 and 2022, which burned 5.77% of the burnable area. Both the annual burned area and the number of fires increased in warm and dry years. Spatially, burn probability decreased with elevation and increased with slope steepness, irrespective of vegetation type. Precipitation decreased burn probability, but this effect was evident only across vegetation types, not within them. Controlling for physical drivers, forests showed the lowest burn probability, and shrublands, the highest. Conclusions Interannual climatic variation strongly controls fire activity in northwestern Patagonia, which is higher in warmer and drier years. The climatic effect is also evident across space, with fire occurring mostly in areas of low elevation (high temperature) and low to intermediate precipitation. Spatially, the effect of topography on fire activity results from how it affects fuel conditions, and not from its effect on the distribution of vegetation types. Conversely, the effect of precipitation resulted mostly from the occurrence of vegetation types with contrasting fuel properties along the precipitation gradient: vegetation types with higher fine fuel amount and continuity and intrinsically lower fuel moisture occurred at low and intermediate precipitation. By quantifying the variation in burn probability among vegetation types while controlling for physical factors, we identified which vegetation types are intrinsically more or less flammable. This may help inform fuel management guidelines.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle