Understanding Loneliness Through Analysis of Twitter and Reddit Data: Comparative Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Loneliness is a global public health issue contributing to a variety of mental and physical health issues. It increases the risk of life-threatening conditions and contributes to the burden on the economy in terms of the number of productive days lost. Loneliness is a highly varied concept, which is associated with multiple factors. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand loneliness through a comparative analysis of loneliness data on Twitter and Reddit, which are popular social media platforms. These platforms differ in terms of their use, as Twitter allows only short posts, while Reddit allows long posts in a forum setting. METHODS: We collected global data on loneliness in October 2022. Twitter posts containing the words "lonely," "loneliness," "alone," "solitude," and "isolation" were collected. Reddit posts were extracted in March 2023. Using natural language processing techniques (valence aware dictionary for sentiment reasoning [VADER] tool from the natural language toolkit [NLTK]), the study identified and extracted relevant keywords and phrases related to loneliness from user-generated content on both platforms. The study used both sentiment analysis and the number of occurrences of a topic. Quantitative analysis was performed to determine the number of occurrences of a topic in tweets and posts, and overall meaningful topics were reported under a category. RESULTS: The extracted data were subjected to comparative analysis to identify common themes and trends related to loneliness across Twitter and Reddit. A total of 100,000 collected tweets and 10,000 unique Reddit posts, including comments, were analyzed. The results of the study revealed the relationships of various social, political, and personal-emotional themes with the expression of loneliness on social media. Both platforms showed similar patterns in terms of themes and categories of discussion in conjunction with loneliness-related content. Both Reddit and Twitter addressed loneliness, but they differed in terms of focus. Reddit discussions were predominantly centered on personal-emotional themes, with a higher occurrence of these topics. Twitter, while still emphasizing personal-emotional themes, included a broader range of categories. Both platforms aligned with psychological linguistic features related to the self-expression of mental health issues. The key difference was in the range of topics, with Twitter having a wider variety of topics and Reddit having more focus on personal-emotional aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Reddit posts provide detailed insights into data about the expression of loneliness, although at the cost of the diversity of themes and categories, which can be inferred from the data. These insights can guide future research using social media data to understand loneliness. The findings provide the basis for further comparative investigation of the expression of loneliness on different social media platforms and online platforms.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».