Constructing piecewise-constant conductivity models for the McArthur River, Canada, uranium mine audio-magnetotelluric data-set
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The McArthur River uranium mine located in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada, is one of the largest high-grade uranium mines in the world. The EXTECH-IV project, managed by the federal and provincial governments and by industrial partners, investigated the unconformity-type uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin, and methods to find them. The audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) data-set was one of the geophysical data-sets acquired in this region during this project. This data-set has subsequently been inverted using a range of 2D and 3D minimum-structure inversion codes — sum-of-squares measures — to model the basement graphitic fault zone associated with the uranium deposit. The constructed conductivity models are in good agreement with each other and show the approximate location and shape of the graphitic fault zone, the "P2" fault, however, they are smeared-out and fuzzy: there is a smooth transition between the conductive anomaly and the background. Hence, we implemented non-L2 measures, in particular the L1 and L0, and the fuzzy c-mean (FCM) clustering approach to invert this data-set for piecewise-constant models with sharp and distinct interfaces. We also compared the capabilities of these three approaches in constructing piecewise-constant models, the sensitivity of the inversion results to a priori information, and the computational cost of the inversion process. These methods that are extensions of the minimum-structure approach retain the capability, robustness, and efficiency of this approach. To invert the data, we discretized the subsurface using an unstructured tetrahedral mesh and included the topography of the study area into the model, unlike the previous studies for which the subsurface was parameterized using rectilinear meshes and the observation points were placed in a flat surface. Instead of rotating the data to align with the trend of the graphitic fault zone, which is in the NE-SW direction, the strike orientation information of the P2 fault was included into the inversion framework. The diagonal and off-diagonal elements of the impedance tensors for a relatively high range of eight frequencies were inverted. The steeply dipping conductive graphitic fault zone in the basement constructed using non-L2 measures and the FCM clustering approach is more piecewise constant and has sharper interfaces compared to the L2 inversion results. The model constructed model using the FCM clustering approach is more localized and distinct compared to the non-L2 inversion results. However, the inversion results using this approach are more sensitive to a priori information provided by the user such as the number of clusters and the cluster center values. Also, this approach introduces more non-linearity into the inverse problem compared to the non-L2 measures, which can make the inversion process computationally expensive. The dependency of the L1 measure on a priori information is less than the L0 measure whereas the obtained models are very similar to each other. Hence, adopting and using one of these three approaches depends on the problem and user preferences. Each of these methods can construct models with sharp, localized, distinct interfaces, which can be more appropriate in many situations than models constructed using the L2 norm. Keywords: Audio-magnetotelluric(AMT), inversion, McArthur uranium mine, piecewise-constant models
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».