Detrital Zircon Geochronology Indicates Synchronous Evolution Of Western Anatolian Supradetachment Basins
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Western Turkey underwent episodic N-S extension following a Late Cretaceous–Paleogene compressional regime. This extension resulted in the formation of the N-S-oriented Selendi and Gördes basins, as well as the E-W-trending Alaşehir Basin. However, the timing of basin formation is debated, hampering geodynamic model development or links to causal mechanisms. Here, we test whether N-S- and E-W-trending basins formed synchronously by determining maximum depositional ages from detrital zircon or stratigraphic ages from zircon-bearing tuffs in the basin fill of the Gördes and Alaşehir Basins.Existing basin chronology for the Gördes Basin is inferential and inconsistent. Previous research suggests the onset of sediment accumulation in the Gördes Basin occurred between 24.1 and 21.7 Ma. However, the older age is based on K-Ar dating of dikes that cross-cut the basement of the Gördes Basin and are lithologically correlated to clasts in the lower basin fill. The younger age comes from the tuffaceous uppermost formation and, therefore, represents a minimum age for the basin fill. K-Ar ages from volcanic domes underlying the oldest stratigraphy in the center of the Gördes Basin range from 18.4 ± 0.8 Ma to 16.3 ± 0.5 Ma, implausibly implying they erupted after the surrounding basin fill was deposited. This discrepancy suggests that either the age of the basin fill or the conclusion that the igneous rocks are volcanic is incorrect.The age of the Alaşehir Basin is based primarily on palynological biostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy. Both yield middle Miocene ages (~16.4–14.4 Ma), but it is unclear whether these represent the oldest stratigraphy in the basin. Detrital zircon provenance data indicate that the earliest basin-filling sediments in the Gördes Basin were derived from a mixture of sources with affinities to the Tauride and Anatolide belts. Sediment provenance changes rapidly upsection, and within 50 meters, the Anatolide source is absent. In the Alaşehir Basin, the Anatolide source is never present, and sediment provenance is dominated by Tauride sources from the onset of basin filling.Preliminary chronostratigraphic data indicate that the onset of sediment accumulation in the Alaşehir and Gördes basins may be synchronous but also highlight significant problems with the stratigraphic model for the Gördes Basin. Data from a sandstone in what is considered the lowermost formation of the Gördes Basin yield a maximum depositional age of 17.5 ± 0.2 Ma, younger than the oldest reported K-Ar ages of 21.7–20.5 Ma. A stratigraphically higher tuffaceous sample from the same formation yields an upward-younging age of 16.9 ± 1.7 Ma. However, two ignimbrite samples from what is considered a younger formation yield ages of 18.2 ± 2.8 Ma. These age inversions and stratigraphic inconsistencies indicate significant issues with the stratigraphic model for the basin. In comparison, a sandstone sample from the lowermost formation of the Alaşehir Basin yields an age of 19.0 ± 2.9 Ma. We conclude that the onset of sedimentation in the two basins is synchronous within the resolution of our methods, but significant work is needed to determine more precise basin chronologies and resolve apparent age inversions in the Gördes Basin.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».