Evaluating Hydrologic Processes and Their Drivers For a Large Geographical Domain
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hydrologic processes are well understood in many locations worldwide and this understanding is commonly encoded as perceptual models of hydrologic behavior. Currently lacking is a large-scale synthesis of this understanding: it is difficult to accurately describe the relation between the drivers of hydrologic behaviors and the resulting hydrologic processes for a given point in space. As large-sample and large-domain modeling is increasingly used, knowledge of the relationship between drivers and processes is crucial to inform modeling decisions, such as the choice of process parametrizations and spatial discretization. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the relationship between hydrologic drivers and processes for large geographical domains. Here, we report progress on a detailed analysis of the connection between hydrologic processes and drivers.Previous studies have investigated the relationship between hydrologic signatures and drivers, identifying climate attributes as the dominant driver in most locations. However, these previous studies did not find clear results for the importance of additional drivers and/or did not focus on a clear connection to hydrologic processes. We investigate the importance of additional drivers, such as land use, subsurface properties, and topography, and their relationship with hydrologic processes in different hydrologic landscapes. These landscapes are derived from a large community-driven initiative and are intended to provide a high-level division of the North American continent into smaller regions that should have distinct hydrologic behavior. For this purpose, we use large sample datasets for the United States and Canada, which help systemize the importance of drivers in time and space and the processes they influence.We evaluate the inter and intra-region variations in signatures and drivers using various statistical analysis methods. Preliminary results confirm that (i) these hydrologic landscapes capture meaningful differences in dominant processes and (ii) the statistical analyses often highlight the most influential drivers within each region and their resulting processes. We will use the gained knowledge to adjust model structures to improve process representation across the continent.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle