Age‐ and Sex‐Specific Patterns in Adult Brain Network Segregation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The human brain is organized into several segregated associative and sensory functional networks, each responsible for various aspects of cognitive and sensory processing. These functional networks become less segregated over the adult lifespan, possibly contributing to cognitive decline that is observed during advanced age. To date, a comprehensive understanding of decreasing network segregation with age has been hampered by (1) small sample sizes, (2) lack of investigation at different spatial scales, (3) the limited age range of participants, and more importantly (4) an inadequate consideration of sex (biological females and males) differences. This study aimed to address these shortcomings. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected from 357 cognitively intact participants (18.2-91.8 years; 49.9 ± 17.1 years; 27.70 ± 1.72 MoCA score, 203 [56.8%] females), and the segregation index (defined as one minus the ratio of between-network connectivity to within-network connectivity) was calculated at three spatial scales of brain networks: whole-brain network, intermediate sensory and associative networks, as well as core visual (VIS), sensorimotor (SMN), frontoparietal (FPN), ventral attention (VAN), dorsal attention (DAN), and default mode networks (DMN). Where applicable, secondary within-, between-, and pairwise connectivity analyses were also conducted to investigate the origin of any observed age and sex effects on network segregation. For any given functional metric, linear and quadratic age effects, sex effects, and respective age by sex interaction effects were assessed using backwards iterative linear regression modeling. Replicating previous work, brain networks were found to become less segregated across adulthood. Specifically, negative quadratic decreases in whole-brain network, intermediate associative network, VAN, and DMN segregation index were observed. Intermediate sensory networks, VIS, and SMN exhibited negative linear decreases in segregation index. Secondary analysis revealed that this process of age-related functional reorganization was preferential as functional connectivity was observed to increase either between anatomically adjacent associative networks (DMN-DAN, FPN-DAN) or between anterior associative and posterior sensory networks (VIS-DAN, VIS-DMN, VIS-FPN, SMN-DMN, and SMN-FPN). Inherent sex differences in network segregation index were also observed. Specifically, whole-brain, associative, DMN, VAN, and FPN segregation index was greater in females compared to males, irrespective of age. Secondary analysis found that females have reduced functional connectivity between associative networks (DAN-VAN, VAN-FPN) compared to males and independent of age. A notable linear age-related decrease in FPN SI was also only observed for females and not males. The observed findings support the notion that functional networks reorganize across the adult lifespan, becoming less segregated. This decline may reflect underlying neurocognitive aging mechanisms like neural dedifferentiation, inefficiency, and compensation. The aging trajectories and rates of decreasing network segregation, however, vary across associative and sensory networks. This study also provides preliminary evidence of inherent sex differences in network organization, where associative networks are more segregated in females than males. These inherent sex differences suggest that female functional networks may be more efficient and functionally specialized compared to males across adulthood. Given these findings, future studies should take a more focused approach to examining sex differences across the lifespan, incorporating multimodal methodologies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».