Kinetic Pattern Recognition in Home-Based Knee Rehabilitation Using Machine Learning Clustering Methods on the Slider Digital Physiotherapy Device: Prospective Observational Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Recent advancements in rehabilitation sciences have progressively used computational techniques to improve diagnostic and treatment approaches. However, the analysis of high-dimensional, time-dependent data continues to pose a significant problem. Prior research has used clustering techniques on rehabilitation data to identify movement patterns and forecast recovery outcomes. Nonetheless, these initiatives have not yet used force or motion datasets obtained outside a clinical setting, thereby limiting the capacity for therapeutic decisions. Biomechanical data analysis has demonstrated considerable potential in bridging these gaps and improving clinical decision-making in rehabilitation settings. OBJECTIVE: This study presents a comprehensive clustering analysis of multidimensional movement datasets captured using a novel home exercise device, the "Slider". The aim is to identify clinically relevant movement patterns and provide answers to open research questions for the first time to inform personalized rehabilitation protocols, predict individual recovery trajectories, and assess the risks of potential postoperative complications. METHODS: High-dimensional, time-dependent, bilateral knee kinetic datasets were independently analyzed from 32 participants using four unsupervised clustering techniques: k-means, hierarchical clustering, partition around medoids, and CLARA (Clustering Large Applications). The data comprised force, laser-measured distance, and optical tracker coordinates from lower limb activities. The optimal clusters identified through the unsupervised clustering methods were further evaluated and compared using silhouette analysis to quantify their performance. Key determinants of cluster membership were assessed, including demographic factors (eg, gender, BMI, and age) and pain levels, by using a logistic regression model with analysis of covariance adjustment. RESULTS: Three distinct, time-varying movement patterns or clusters were identified for each knee. Hierarchical clustering performed best for the right knee datasets (with an average silhouette score of 0.637), while CLARA was the most effective for the left knee datasets (with an average silhouette score of 0.598). Key predictors of the movement cluster membership were discovered for both knees. BMI was the most influential determinant of cluster membership for the right knee, where higher BMI decreased the odds of cluster-2 membership (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96; P<.001) but increased the odds for cluster-3 assignment relative to cluster 1 (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06; P<.001). For the left knee, all predictors of cluster-2 membership were significant (.001≤P≤.008), whereas only BMI (P=.81) could not predict the likelihood of an individual belonging to cluster 3 compared to cluster 1. Gender was the strongest determinant for the left knee, with male participants significantly likely to belong to cluster 3 (OR 3.52, 95% CI 2.91-4.27; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: These kinetic patterns offer significant insights for creating personalized rehabilitation procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes. These findings underscore the efficacy of unsupervised clustering techniques in the analysis of biomechanical data for clinical rehabilitation applications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».