The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Reducing Environmental Impacts in The Oil and Gas Industry from A Legal Perspective: A Comparative and Case Study
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Despite playing a significant role in energy supply and advancing the global economy, the oil and gas industry is recognized as one of the main sources of environmental pollution. This pollution includes the destruction of natural habitats, contamination of water and soil resources, and the widespread emission of greenhouse gases, which necessitates effective intervention by legal regulations and new technologies. In this context, artificial intelligence, as a transformative technology, has unique capabilities in identifying and mitigating these environmental impacts. This research takes a legal-analytical approach to examine the role of artificial intelligence in managing the environmental challenges of the oil and gas industry, exploring the legal and executive dimensions related to the application of this technology. In this regard, topics such as identifying and preventing oil spills, optimizing energy consumption, and continuously monitoring the quality of biological resources are discussed from a legal perspective. Additionally, challenges such as legal responsibility in the errors of artificial intelligence systems, data ownership, compliance with international environmental standards, and legal dimensions of cybersecurity are investigated and analyzed. The results of the research indicate that despite the high potential of artificial intelligence in reducing harmful environmental impacts and enhancing operational efficiency, the lack of clear legal frameworks and existing regulatory gaps pose serious obstacles to the optimal utilization of this technology. Comparative studies conducted with the legal systems of advanced countries such as Norway, Canada, and the Netherlands illustrate that success in integrating artificial intelligence with environmental requirements necessitates the formulation of precise regulations and advanced technological infrastructures. Ultimately, this research emphasizes the necessity of synergy between technology and legal regulations by providing practical suggestions such as formulating special legal standards, strengthening administrative oversight, and designing transparent mechanisms regarding data ownership and responsibility. The main objective of this research is to create a foundation for the responsible use of artificial intelligence in the oil and gas industry and to move towards sustainable development and environmental protection
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle