Comparing the Effectiveness of Emotion-Based and Attachment-Based Family Therapy on Emotional Distress Tolerance, Self-Differentiation and Alexithymia in Adolescent Girls with Psychosomatic Disorders
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background and Objective: Psychosomatic disorders as one of the most common mental disorders are considered important public health challenges and cause many psychological problems. Consequently, the aim of this study was to comparing the effectiveness of emotion-based and attachment-based family therapy on emotional distress tolerance, self-differentiation and alexithymia in adolescent girls with psychosomatic disorders. Methods and Materials: This research was a quasi-experimental with a pre-test and post-test design with a control group. The research population was high school girl students of Ahvaz city who referred to counseling and psychological services centers in this city. The research sample was 60 people who were selected through simple random sampling method and randomly assigned to three groups of 20 people. The first experimental group received 5 sessions of two-hour by method of emotion-based family therapy, the second experimental group received 10 sessions of two-hour by method of attachment-based family therapy and during this period the control group received no training. To collect data were used the emotional distress tolerance scale (Simmons & Gaher, 2005), self-differentiation inventory (Skowron & Frielander, 1998) and Toronto alexithymia scale (Bagby et al., 1994) and its data were analyzed by methods of multivariate analysis of covariance and Bonferroni post hoc tests in SPSS software. Findings: The findings showed that both intervention methods of emotion-based and attachment-based family therapy in compared to the control group significantly reduced emotional distress tolerance and alexithymia and significantly increased self-differentiation in adolescent girls with psychosomatic disorders (P<0.05). Also, there was no significant difference between the effectiveness of both intervention methods of emotion-based and attachment-based family therapy on reducing emotional distress tolerance and alexithymia and increasing self-differentiation in adolescent girls with psychosomatic disorders (P<0.05). Conclusion: According to the results of this research, health professionals and therapists can use both emotion-based and attachment-based family therapy methods in their interventions to improve psychological characteristics.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».