Optimal Recovery Following Pediatric Concussion
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Pediatric concussion affects millions and results in heterogeneous outcomes and recovery trajectories. Given favorable outcome for most children, it is useful to understand characteristics of positive outcome to promote full recovery in all children. Objective: To document the timeframe of recovery to optimal functioning, defined comprehensively across motor-physical, cognitive, socioemotional, and resilience-support domains, after concussion among children ages 8 to 16 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this prospective cohort study, children ages 8 to 16.99 years with a concussion or orthopedic injury (OI) were recruited between September 2016 and July 2019 from 5 Pediatric Emergency Research Canada emergency departments and assessed approximately 10 days, 3 months, and 6 months after their injury. Data were analyzed from January 29, 2024, to January 11, 2025. Exposure: Concussion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants completed self-report and direct assessment measures of postconcussive symptoms, physical activity and function, balance, cognitive function, quality of life, resilience, and social support. The main outcome was optimal functioning, which was derived from 11 variables and criteria indicative of absence of impairment and average or above functioning in each domain (overall score, 0-11; higher score indicates better function). A longitudinal, multivariable, cumulative probability ordinal regression model was fitted to examine factors associated with optimal functioning. Results: A total of 967 children (median [IQR] age, 12.3 [10.5-14.3] years; 562 [58.1%] male) were enrolled, including 633 children with a concussion and 334 children with an OI. The median (IQR) optimal functioning scores for the OI group were 6.0 (4.0-8.0) at 10 days, 7.0 (5.0-9.0) at 3 months, and 7 (5.0-9.0) at 6 months, compared with 4.0 (2.0-6.0) at 10 days, 6.0 (4.0-9.0) at 3 months, and 7.0 (4.0-9.0) at 6 months in the concussion group. The 3 main variables (time, sex, and group) were significantly associated with optimal functioning, as were all 2-way interactions. Time was the strongest factor associated with optimal functioning (Wald χ258 = 485.11; P < .001), followed by group (Wald χ26 = 95.10; P < .001), and sex (Wald χ26 = 23.19; P < .001). At the 10-day follow-up, concussion was associated with lower optimal functioning than OI among females (odds ratio [OR], 0.24 [95% CI, 0.16-0.36]) and males (OR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.26-0.53]). This difference persisted for females at 3 months (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.35-0.93]) but not for males. Optimal functioning was comparable at 6 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort study of children with concussion, achieving optimal functioning levels across physical, cognitive, socioemotional, and resilience domains took 3 months or more, especially for girls with concussion. Multiple domains of outcome need to be taken into account when considering full recovery and optimal function after pediatric concussion.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».