Exploring Smart Health Wearable Adoption Among Singaporean Older Adults Based on Self-Determination Theory: Web-Based Survey Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Smart health wearables offer significant benefits for older adults, enabling seamless health monitoring and personalized suggestions based on real-time data. Promoting adoption and sustained use among older adults is essential to empower autonomous health management, leading to better health outcomes, improved quality of life, and reduced strain on health care systems. Objective: This study investigates how autonomy-related contextual factors, including artificial intelligence (AI) anxiety, perceived privacy risks, and health consciousness, are related to older adults' psychological needs of competence, autonomy, and relatedness (RQ1). We then examined whether the fulfillment of these needs positively predicts older adults' intentions to adopt these devices (H1), and how they mediate the relationship between these factors and older adults' intentions to use smart health wearables (RQ2). Additionally, it compares experienced and nonexperienced older adult users regarding the influence of these psychological needs on use intentions (RQ3). Methods: A web-based survey was conducted with individuals aged 60 years and above in Singapore, using a Qualtrics survey panel. A total of 306 participants (177 male; mean age of 65.47 years, age range 60-85 years) completed the survey. A structural equation model was used to analyze associations among AI anxiety, perceived privacy risks, and health consciousness, and the mediating factors of competence, autonomy, and relatedness, as well as their relationship to smart health wearable use intention. Results: Health consciousness positively influenced all intrinsic motivation factors-competence, autonomy, and relatedness-while perceived privacy risks negatively affected all three. AI anxiety was negatively associated with competence only. Both privacy risk perceptions and health consciousness were indirectly linked to older adults' intentions to use smart health wearables through competence and relatedness. No significant differences were found in motivational structures between older adults with prior experience and those without. Conclusions: This study contributes to the application of self-determination theory in promoting the use of smart technology for health management among older adults. The results highlight the critical role of intrinsic motivation-particularly competence-in older adults' adoption of smart health wearables. While privacy concerns diminish motivation, health consciousness fosters it. The study results offer valuable implications for designing technologies that align with older adults' motivations, potentially benefiting aging populations in other technologically advanced societies. Developers should focus on intuitive design, transparent privacy practices, and social features to encourage adoption, empowering older adults to use smart wearables for proactive health management.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».