MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4408757436 · doi:10.35422/cwsk.2024.87.141

The Theory of Neo correction Nursing by Chun Jung-hwan emeritus Professor

2024· article· en· W4408757436 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Correction Welfare Society of Korea · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMedical Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychoanalysisSociologyNursingMedicinePsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Correctional medicine, which has been influenced by the Western philosophy of empirical dualism, has been dominated by biomedical medical models. In the history of correctional nursing, the American Nursing Association recognized the expertise of correctional nursing in 1975 and a holistic medical model reflecting the ideology of the 1986 WHO Ottawa Charter has been declared that reflects the social and psychological needs of the prisoners, deviating from the biomedical medical model in the UN's principle of treatment of prisoners in 1990. In Korea, there are six studies on correctional nursing from 1945 to November 2024, although many studies have been conducted in developed countries as well as in developing countries.Due to the lack of history of correctional nursing, academic identity has not been established clearly. Due to the limitations of domestic and foreign previous studies, there is a limit to the lack of identity and representation in the concept, and the narrowness of ideology overlooks various corrective nursing ideologies and third, even though it is applied science, there is no basic theory of integrated model of correctional nursing. The content of the previous study is limited because the researchers lack an interdisciplinary perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to criticize the problems of previous studies and to create a new theory of correctional nursing through the concept, ideology and theoretical model of new correctional nursing and this study proposes a psychosocial welfare theory that reflects the context of value-oriented welfare ideology, breaking away from the value-neutral, administrative and technical correctional nursing theory. At the same time, various new concepts such as medical welfare resocialization were newly created. Medical welfare resocialization is correctional artistic nursing as a basis for rehabilitation through the recovery process by cultural,artistic caring considering the individual story of the prisoner, and furthermore, to be recreated as new self by realizing community citizenship. It is only possible for nurses and unfriendly to doctors. This is because the unconditional caring medical care of nurses, which is based on welfare compassion and humanistic sophisticated art, is completely different from the professional medical practice of doctors whose essence is only formal technology. The holistic recovery of a patient crouched in a cold prison cell is possible only with the artistic medical care of a nurse based on the warm affection in one's heart that can melt the cold prison cell as well as the physician's mechanical professional medical practice .As a result, it can be an opportunity for re-socialization of prisoners. In this respect, medical welfare resocialization by nurses should be illuminated. Nurses are the actors of medical resocialization in that caregiving medical care is the primary purpose, but the resocialization and the development of scientific correction techniques are legally obligatory by the correctional laws. Medical resocialization by nurses is different from intentional, purposive, authoritative, and involuntary bureaucratic resocialization by guards in that it is a non-manifestive, potential, unintentional, contextual intention, and resulting personality. Since the practice of medical welfare and the practice of correctional welfare are involved in the practice of “medical resocialization”, it was first theorized as the ideology of correctional nursing in the sense of “medical welfare (nursing welfare) resocialization”. Nursing and correction theroy are applied sciences and social welfare approaches are essential, but previous studies on correction nursing study have not taken a corrective nursing welfare approach at all.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,004
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,323
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Correction Welfare Society of KoreaMême sujetMedical Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207