Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear friends, We are entering into the eight year of our joint travel through science of gymnastics. We are starting new year with excellent news. Our journal will be now visible also in Web of Science in Core Collection. Web of Science have now new part, which is called ESCI- Emerging Sources Citation Index and it was established last year. We received information of inclusion after we published October issue last year. So our articles are now included into two very important data bases – Scopus and Web of Science. The first four article are from biomechanics and the first article comes from Slovene and Czech authors Maja Bučar Pajek, Petr Hedbávný, Miriam Kalichová and Ivan Čuk. They did simple research by methods, but important by results. Women gymnastics on balance beam significantly influences one sided load, therefore rises bilateral asymetries, which are one of important reasons for ijnuries. The second article is from United States of America, authors Timothy J. Suchomel, William A. Sands and Jeni R. Mcneal are sharing their experience with US male junior national team on their abilities measured on tensiometric plate. As their subjects are one of the best in the world it is worth to take their results to compare with your juniors. The third article is from combined France and Canadian team of researchers Aurore Huchez, Diane Haering, Patrice Holvoet, Franck Barbier, Mickael Begon, thir article is about women artistic gymnastics, uneven bars, transition from low to high bar. Comparision between low and high level of gymnasts give coaches clear guideline where to direct their attention. The fourth article is from Serbian and Slovene contributors Saša Veličković, Miloš Paunović, Dejan Madić, Vladan Vukašinović, Edvard Kolar, with similar idea as previous article, to focus coaches on their gymnasts when perform basket to handstand on parallel bars. The fith article is from Spain researchers María Alejandra Ávalos Ramos, María Ángeles Martínez Ruiz, Gladys Merma Molina and thir resarch is valuable for all us teachers who do teach students about gymnastics, the most important guide to us is we should focus to real conditions which are in classes in primary and secondary schools. The sixth article is from a huge Brazilian and Portugal team (consisted of 10 members) and they give us information about general gymnastics, more specific we get insight on how Pan American Gymnastics Union members contribute to the World Gymnaestrada. The last article is also combined with researchers from two countries, Spain and Portugal. Catarina Leandro, Lurdes Ávila-Carvalho, Elena Sierra-Palmeiro, Marta Bobo-Arce prepared analyse of technical content of elite rhytmic gymnastics. It is worth to notice, their analysis would be benefitial to FIG RGTC to improve their rules. Anton Gajdoš in Short Historical Notes V prepared a memo about the team representing Finland in 1948, including Akimoto Kaneko and Helena Rakoczy. New content in journal is list of reviewers, who helped us last year with their knowledge. Just to remind you, if you quote the Journal: its abbreviation on the Web of Knowledge is SCI GYMNASTICS J. I wish you pleasant reading and a lot of inspiration for new research projects and articles. Ivan Čuk, Editor-in-Chief
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,026 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,164 | 0,102 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».