Cancer, precision medicine, and Atlantic Canada: A priority setting exercise by the Atlantic Cancer Consortium Patient Advisory Committee
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Precision Medicine in oncology is a rapidly evolving field aiming to prevent and treat cancers based on detailed patient and tumor characteristics. To better develop research studies, healthcare services and policies, and access to Precision Medicine, integration of insight and experiences of cancer patients and family members is required. In this paper, we describe the patient and family priorities regarding Precision Medicine as identified by the Atlantic Cancer Consortium Patient Advisory Committee (ACC PAC). The ACC PAC was formed in January 2024 and met virtually five times between January and May of 2024. It included a diverse set of 12 patients and family members of patients from across the Atlantic Canadian provinces, a coordinator, an oncologist/clinician-scientist, and a cancer scientist. During meetings, the committee focused on identifying patient and family priorities in Atlantic Canada. Three guests with lived experiences were invited to further diversify the committee’s discussions. Discussions were summarized by the coordinator and cancer scientist. Summaries were then reviewed by the ACC PAC members in September 2024. The ACC PAC identified priorities on two general themes: (1) preventing and addressing cancer’s effects on the whole person/family (for example, by accessible information and support programs), and (2) understanding and accessing Precision Medicine (for example, by research, education, and wider implementation). While the ACC PAC members were optimistic about the utility of Precision Oncology, they also made it clear that it was unlikely to be sufficient without a team-based, holistic and equitable approach to cancer care. Better quality healthcare, education, resources, and effort by all stakeholders were established as essential for effective cancer control and Precision Medicine. A key responsibility falls on the shoulders of funders, organizations, policy-makers and governments in addressing cancer’s effects, improving public knowledge of cancer and Precision Medicine, and improving access to high-quality healthcare and precision medicines. Patient partners and committees such as the ACC PAC can inform and help every step of these efforts with their patient-centered insights and perspectives. In early 2024, we formed the Atlantic Cancer Consortium Patient Advisory Committee (ACC PAC). Our group includes patients and family members affected by cancer from all four provinces of Atlantic Canada, in addition to a coordinator, an oncologist/clinician-scientist, and a cancer scientist. Together, we have identified patient and family priorities as they relate to cancer and Precision Medicine. Here we describe these priorities and our recommendations. Precision Medicine is an emerging cancer care strategy. In this strategy, a person’s circumstances and detailed disease features are considered so that the person can get the best possible care. In cancer, Precision Medicine strategy can help improve treatment success and patient outcomes. Our work indicates that while Precision Medicine strategy is promising, it requires more understanding, research, education, and accessibility. In addition, there is a need for holistic and equitable care that is accessible to all and that involves various care providers that support the patient and family. We recommend that all stakeholders work together efficiently to address the issues faced by the individuals and families affected by cancer in the region. The heaviest responsibility to address these issues lies on healthcare organizations and governments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».