Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension was launched in 1992. It is part of a successful series of review journals whose unique format is designed to provide a systematic and critical assessment of the literature as presented in the many primary journals. The field of nephrology and hypertension is divided into 12 sections that are each reviewed once a year. Each section is assigned a Section Editor, a leading authority in the area, who identifies the most important topics at that time. Here we are pleased to introduce the Section Editors for this issue. SECTION EDITORS Agnes B FogoAgnes B FogoProfessor Agnes Borge Fogo completed her medical training at Vanderbilt University Medical School, USA. She has remained at Vanderbilt for residency in pathology and fellowship in renal pathology and experimental kidney disease models. Her main research interests are focused on potential regression of chronic kidney disease and tubular-glomerular crosstalk in this process, pursued with funding from the National Institutes of Health and other sources. She is also dedicated to diagnostic renal pathology and has created an online Atlas of Renal Pathology with the American Journal of Kidney Disease and the National Kidney Foundation. She has also authored two books on renal pathology. Prof. Fogo enjoys teaching renal pathology and received the Robert G. Narins award from the American Society of Nephrology in 2011 as well as the Roscoe R. Robinson award from the International Society of Nephrology in 2019, for her contributions in teaching. She is currently President of the ISN and the John L. Shapiro Professor of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Professor of Medicine and Paediatrics and Director of the Renal/Electron Microscopy Laboratory at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. Navdeep TangriNavdeep TangriDr Tangri is an attending physician and Professor in the Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, and the Rady Faculty of Community Health Sciences at the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Dr Tangri's research program is clinical, translational, and focused on improving clinical decision making for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. He developed and validated the Kidney Failure Risk Equation to predict the need for dialysis in patients with CKD and is presently engaged in multiple validation and implementation exercises to increase the uptake of the KFRE. In addition, Dr Tangri is conducting a large prospective study on frailty, physical and cognitive function in advanced CKD, as well as leading a multinational randomized trial on the safety and efficacy of a new therapy in this population. He has published over 300 manuscripts, presented at multiple national and international scientific meetings, and is a recipient of the CIHR New Investigator Award and a CIHR Foundation grant.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».