MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4408996265 · doi:10.1177/00219096251331090

Book Review: The Unfinished Quest: India’s Search for Major Power Status from Nehru to Modi PaulT. V., The Unfinished Quest: India’s Search for Major Power Status from Nehru to Modi, Oxford University Press, New York, 2024; ISBN 9780197669990 (hardback), price $29.99, 280 pp.

2025· article· en· W4408996265 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eswaran Sridharan

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Asian and African Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueIndian Economic and Social Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPower (physics)Political scienceDevelopment economicsEconomicsPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

of McGill University, one of the leading scholars of India's international relations, analyses India's quest for major power status from independence to the present, from the leadership of Nehru to that of Modi, in this historically, theoretically and empirically rich book.He uses the term 'major power' instead of 'great power', a standard in the literature, and 'global power' rather than 'superpower' for the United States.India's rise since the early 1990s is well-known.Its rising status is captured from being the 16th largest economy in 1993 to the fifth largest by 2022, its nuclear tests of 1998 with its nuclear weapon power status legitimized by the global power United States in the 2005-08 civil nuclear agreement, its growing defence cooperation with the United States both bilaterally and multilaterally, and its presidency of the Group of 20 (G-20) in 2023.During the past three decades its search for status that began since independence accelerated.But what is status in international relations and why do states seek it?Status can be viewed as the collective beliefs about a state's ranking on valued attributes such as wealth, military strength, diplomatic clout, demographic position and socio-political organization.Status needs external acknowledgement, especially by peers.States seek status as it can bring benefits such as special rights or leverage.This is particularly so if status enables membership of exclusive clubs like permanent membership of the UN Security Council or being one of the few states that possess nuclear weapons.Status can bring a material advantage.Paul cites Gilpin in saying that prestige, over actual power, is the daily currency of international relations.Status in international affairs can also boost domestic legitimacy and power for leaders, governments and ruling parties.What are the ingredients of status?While military power has historically been considered the key ingredient, Paul updates status theorizing by outlining ten key elements that make for a comprehensive national power capability -the four main ones being military, economic, technological/knowledge and demographic attributes, the other six being the state's normative position, its leadership role in international institutions, its cultural attributes, its state capacity, and effective national leadership.Paul gives a detailed historical account of India's quest for status from Nehru onward.He analyses hard power -military strength, economic growth, scientific-technological and demographic attributes -and soft power factors such as culture, communication and democracy, in India's power composition and status-seeking diplomacy.He situates these in India's relations with the global and major powers, and with India's neighbours, over time and changing governments/leaders.Nehru, 1947-64, used India's soft power resources of the time to punch above its weight in promoting decolonization, anti-racism and nonalignment.These included its moral standing due to its successful non-violent independence movement, its civilisational heritage and its democratic credentials.However, it should be noted that the foundations for hard power were also quietly laid by Nehru in the form of a dual-purpose atomic energy programme from 1948, a space launch programme from 1962, and a heavy industrialization programme as well as a network of scientific and technological institutions.The India-China War of 1962 was a huge setback in India's perceived status.Indira Gandhi, Prime Minister from 1966 to 1977 and 1980 to 1984, continued the nuclear and space programmes, won a major victory over Pakistan in 1971, conducted a one-off nuclear test in 1974, and launched a missile programme in 1983 while refusing to sign the 1968 Nonproliferation

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,224
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Asian and African StudiesMême sujetIndian Economic and Social DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207